Re: [PATCH] Change message when reaching end of reverse history.

[Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>]

>>>>> Metzger, Markus T <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> writes:

> We should probably give MI a similar indication, although that would likely
> break existing MI consumers.  Not sure how opt-in is handled in MI.

I thought perhaps this change was just about being more clear to users
-- which isn't really a concern for MI consumers.  So my first reaction
is to wonder if this really is needed for MI.

Anyway in MI there are a few ways to change things without breaking
consumers.  One way is to add a new field to the output.  Another way is
opt-in behavior -- a new command to enable the new behavior, or simply
enabling it in the "next" MI version.

Tom