From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46853 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2018 16:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 46311 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jun 2018 16:54:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=gpg, GPG X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:54:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0484002248; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-196.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.196]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D751C59E; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:54:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 8.2 branch 2018-06-22 Update References: <20180622140540.GC3128@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20180622140540.GC3128@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:05:40 -0400") Message-ID: <87fu1eep8o.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00546.txt.bz2 On Friday, June 22 2018, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi everyone, Hey Joel, > * (SergioDJ) Implement IPv6 support for GDB/gdbserver > > From what I can tell, a v2 was sent, and a review done just > a couple of days ago. Is that accurate? > > [v2] https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00384.html > [v1] https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-06/msg00238.html Yes, that is accurate. I'm now working on addressing a few aspects of the review, but it is still a bit unclear to me whether my new approach will be accepted or whether Pedro's suggested approach will work without problems. I'm doing some testing to determine what to do next. I'd like to know: if, for some reason, I'm unable to get this patch accepted until, say, next Thursday (June 28th), would it be OK to remove it from the list of blockers, and to backport it to the branch later? I'm asking because I don't want to be the one blocking the branching from happening, since the IPv6 feature is not a major regression/problem to be fixed anyway. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/