From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B5263858434 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:58:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1B5263858434 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from cmgw10.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.125]) by progateway6.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8318610047A65 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id gRtlnZGi0Qs3CgRtlnesbb; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:58:37 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=A+Opg4aG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=625d6e8d a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=z0gMJWrwH1QA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=CCpqsmhAAAAA:8 a=Qd4vpfvt8P75uqabvSgA:9 a=ul9cdbp4aOFLsgKbc677:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nNZoG7eGpzl1IEIvfYGDoaunNxF+ePX+N45WwITWa0E=; b=jO1dD/OJRjbv5NrNPNHPSMEDg1 5psWR6/ARgANgkznG1Q0SKkHGoZmJdRTX8Cx8c4GF54m5s7cWXpzuf232aP0R84eq0qjAGT+j1FPt yUl/qRybtUMlxZdGGAOa4Lvgf; Received: from 71-211-154-204.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.211.154.204]:55594 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ngRtk-003wsc-Oz; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:58:36 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Simon Farre via Gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gdb/Python: Added ThreadExitedEvent References: <20220412090315.1142824-1-simon.farre.cx@gmail.com> <83v8va1660.fsf@gnu.org> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:58:36 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Simon Farre via Gdb-patches's message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:38:14 +0200") Message-ID: <87h76qxzlf.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 71.211.154.204 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1ngRtk-003wsc-Oz X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 71-211-154-204.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [71.211.154.204]:55594 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 14 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3023.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:58:39 -0000 >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Farre via Gdb-patches writes: Simon> I was unaware of the LWP not being cross-platform, perhaps this Simon> field should be removed then? Or is there some relevant/similar Simon> info on other platforms that can be returned here (and by that Simon> logic, also change the attribute to a name that logically could Simon> explain the attribute in a cross-platform manner?) Which fields in a ptid are used depends on the target. There's been some attempt to regularize this across targets, but TBH I don't know if that's been completed or not. (And despite having done some of this, I also forgot what the rule is :-) Anyway I wouldn't worry about it. Emitting the thread object alone would probably be better. And, if someone references the LWP and it isn't set, it will just be 0. Tom