From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961AC3858C74 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:21:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 961AC3858C74 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from cmgw12.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.127]) by progateway6.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B84100408A6 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id S00ankSDZctgJS00annvfJ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 17:21:57 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Oq2Kdwzt c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6228e235 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=o8Y5sQTvuykA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=T_Alst9gAAAA:8 a=wyxKDs3QaZzvx4CCgBsA:9 a=DvZ5ixILWSEuw56YIEpp:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=av+N3kUAviaJY0cwX9FCbvUcUfRFk9jJJ0HJ3M1hqoQ=; b=D2LGdWzoDOZFOFiyjd53ciy3pj Z0b8fN2nqNWYLZtveLe5NWLX12emndZ4Zvo+Q/SGDGvo9OhwXqZV/SCOPTH+KsL3ntvf/ld2TFWNW YA6tBOklYXiiCaHDmHoQbB+3v; Received: from 75-166-141-253.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.141.253]:37942 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nS00a-000f7A-AD; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 10:21:56 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Keith Seitz , Keith Seitz via Gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make gdb.fortran/{array-slices,lbound-ubound} work against gdbserver References: <20220224174100.1620375-1-keiths@redhat.com> <87k0dioq6s.fsf@tromey.com> <4f0def89-1a03-3d2c-15a0-572f0bb7566a@polymtl.ca> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 10:21:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:27:31 +0000") Message-ID: <87h787oxcc.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 75.166.141.253 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1nS00a-000f7A-AD X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 75-166-141-253.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [75.166.141.253]:37942 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 5 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3024.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 17:22:04 -0000 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Keith mentioned he might be away this week, so I went ahead and played with this. We Pedro> can't use gdb_test_stdio here, because that maps to gdb_test, and we want gdb_test_multiple Pedro> instead. So we use inferior_spawn_id with gdb_test_multiple instead. Thanks. Pedro> It took me some head scratching and staring at logs to figure out why the patch Pedro> wasn't working -- I was hitting a buglet in gdb.fortran/array-slices.f90, argh. Pedro> With that out of the way, both testcases now pass cleanly with gdbserver too. Pedro> Here's the proposed patch. Any comments? It looks fine to me. Tom