From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87033 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2019 16:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 86997 invoked by uid 89); 26 Apr 2019 16:45:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:45:35 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80C730BEE2F for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-196.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.196]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3D15D70A; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:45:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH+8.3?] Implement dump of mappings with ELF headers by gcore References: <20190423234635.26916-1-sergiodj@redhat.com> <20190425102100.08da12eb@f29-4.lan> <87mukec594.fsf@redhat.com> <20190425140431.37bd03fc@f29-4.lan> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20190425140431.37bd03fc@f29-4.lan> (Kevin Buettner's message of "Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:04:31 -0700") Message-ID: <87imv0af6b.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00574.txt.bz2 On Thursday, April 25 2019, Kevin Buettner wrote: > If 8.3 is getting close, I think it should only go in master. But > if 8.3 still has some outstanding issues and testing yet to be done, > it might go in, especially if non-Fedora users are noticing problems. Sure, no problem. If it's decided that this shouldn't go in 8.3, I can always include this patch in the next Fedora GDB release as well (since there's a Fedora bug related to this). Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/