From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6992 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 02:33:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6958 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jan 2015 02:33:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 02:33:30 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1YAUoo-0004lC-Vf from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:33:27 -0800 Received: from GreenOnly (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:33:26 -0800 From: Yao Qi To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Subject: Re: [patch] Fix jit-reader.h for multilib References: <20150107173634.GA13295@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87387htths.fsf@codesourcery.com> <20150111131353.GA9107@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 02:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20150111131353.GA9107@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:13:53 +0100") Message-ID: <87iogcsp6m.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil writes: > # multi-lib safety means that files with the same pathname (which is > # /usr/include, contrary to /usr/lib vs. /usr/lib64 for example) > # contain exactly the same content. > Thanks, that is clear to me now. > See also: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks#File_confli= cts > > > When we discuss it personally I do not think multilib should be applied t= o the > GDB package as there is nothing like /usr/lib{,64}/libgdb.so. There is o= nly > /usr/bin/gdb and that has always just one arch on one system. So install= ing > gdb.i686 and gdb.x86_64 simultaneously does not have any benefits / makes > sense. But despites this I need it for Red Hat packaging so I am fine to= also > keep it just as a downstream patch. OTOH I guess other OS packagers may = also > face it so it may be easier for everyone to do it upstream. Is multi-lib safety a Fedora/Red Hat specific packaging rule? or do other distributions need this too? If answer is yes, I don't object to your patch as it adjusts the order of looking for desired types. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)