public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>,
	Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sim: Make WITH_{TRACE,PROFILE}-based macros bool
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 12:38:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k05efqjy.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0cdd12332c8bcf79974dc060cc8825ec254b906.1663073826.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>

Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> writes:

> Clang generates a warning if an ambiguous expression (possibly a bitwise
> operation (& or |) but a logical operator (&& or ||) is used) is detected.
> Because of the default configuration ("-Werror"), it causes a build failure.
>
> This is caused by predicate macros that use (base_variable & flag).
> Clang considers them as regular integer values (not boolean) and
> generates that warning.
>
> This commit makes Clang to think those predicate macros to be boolean.
>
> sim/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* common/sim-profile.h (WITH_PROFILE_INSN_P, WITH_PROFILE_MEMORY_P,
> 	WITH_PROFILE_MODEL_P, WITH_PROFILE_SCACHE_P, WITH_PROFILE_PC_P,
> 	WITH_PROFILE_CORE_P): Make predicate macros boolean.
> 	* common/sim-trace.h (WITH_TRACE_P, WITH_TRACE_ANY_P): Likewise.
> ---
>  sim/common/sim-profile.h | 12 ++++++------
>  sim/common/sim-trace.h   |  4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sim/common/sim-profile.h b/sim/common/sim-profile.h
> index 61d5039e10d..acf0f7d74e2 100644
> --- a/sim/common/sim-profile.h
> +++ b/sim/common/sim-profile.h
> @@ -87,12 +87,12 @@ SIM_RC sim_profile_set_option (SIM_DESC sd_, const char *name_, int idx_,
>  #define PROFILE_core   (1 << PROFILE_CORE_IDX)
>  
>  /* Preprocessor macros to simplify tests of WITH_PROFILE.  */
> -#define WITH_PROFILE_INSN_P (WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_insn)
> -#define WITH_PROFILE_MEMORY_P (WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_memory)
> -#define WITH_PROFILE_MODEL_P (WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_model)
> -#define WITH_PROFILE_SCACHE_P (WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_scache)
> -#define WITH_PROFILE_PC_P (WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_pc)
> -#define WITH_PROFILE_CORE_P (WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_core)
> +#define WITH_PROFILE_INSN_P   (!!(WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_insn))
> +#define WITH_PROFILE_MEMORY_P (!!(WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_memory))
> +#define WITH_PROFILE_MODEL_P  (!!(WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_model))
> +#define WITH_PROFILE_SCACHE_P (!!(WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_scache))
> +#define WITH_PROFILE_PC_P     (!!(WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_pc))
> +#define WITH_PROFILE_CORE_P   (!!(WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_core))

Rather than using this '!!' trick, which I'm really not a fan of, could
we just do:

  #define WITH_PROFILE_CORE_P   ((WITH_PROFILE & PROFILE_core) != 0)

I feel this is an accurate representation of the question we're actually
asking.

Thanks,
Andrew


>  
>  /* If MAX_TARGET_MODES isn't defined, we can't do memory profiling.
>     ??? It is intended that this is a temporary occurrence.  Normally
> diff --git a/sim/common/sim-trace.h b/sim/common/sim-trace.h
> index d08810d9fcc..bc3e690a4cc 100644
> --- a/sim/common/sim-trace.h
> +++ b/sim/common/sim-trace.h
> @@ -125,10 +125,10 @@ enum {
>  #define TRACE_debug    (1 << TRACE_DEBUG_IDX)
>  
>  /* Return non-zero if tracing of idx is enabled (compiled in).  */
> -#define WITH_TRACE_P(idx)	(WITH_TRACE & (1 << idx))
> +#define WITH_TRACE_P(idx)	(!!(WITH_TRACE & (1 << idx)))
>  
>  /* Preprocessor macros to simplify tests of WITH_TRACE.  */
> -#define WITH_TRACE_ANY_P	(WITH_TRACE)
> +#define WITH_TRACE_ANY_P	(!!(WITH_TRACE))
>  #define WITH_TRACE_INSN_P	WITH_TRACE_P (TRACE_INSN_IDX)
>  #define WITH_TRACE_DISASM_P	WITH_TRACE_P (TRACE_DISASM_IDX)
>  #define WITH_TRACE_DECODE_P	WITH_TRACE_P (TRACE_DECODE_IDX)
> -- 
> 2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-13 12:57 [PATCH 0/4] sim/common: Suppress warnings if built with Clang Tsukasa OI
2022-09-13 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] sim: Add ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF Tsukasa OI
2022-09-13 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] sim: Remove self-assignments Tsukasa OI
2022-09-13 12:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] sim: Make WITH_{TRACE,PROFILE}-based macros bool Tsukasa OI
2022-10-05 11:38   ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2022-10-06  5:33     ` Tsukasa OI
2022-09-13 12:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] sim: Suppress non-literal printf warning Tsukasa OI
2022-10-05 11:45   ` Andrew Burgess
2022-10-06  5:39     ` Tsukasa OI
2022-10-23 12:22       ` Mike Frysinger
2022-10-24 10:50         ` Tsukasa OI
2022-09-25  8:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] sim: Suppress warnings if built with Clang Tsukasa OI
2022-09-25  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] sim: Remove self-assignments Tsukasa OI
2022-09-25  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] sim: Make WITH_{TRACE,PROFILE}-based macros bool Tsukasa OI
2022-09-25  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] sim: Suppress non-literal printf warning Tsukasa OI
2022-09-25  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sim: Check known getopt definition existence Tsukasa OI
2022-09-25  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] sim: Initialize pbb_br_* by default Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  6:43   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] sim: Suppress warnings if built with Clang Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  6:43     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] sim: Remove self-assignments Tsukasa OI
2022-10-11 14:21       ` Andrew Burgess
2022-10-11 14:29         ` Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  6:43     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] sim: Make WITH_{TRACE,PROFILE}-based macros bool Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  6:43     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] sim: Suppress non-literal printf warning Tsukasa OI
2022-10-11 14:22       ` Andrew Burgess
2022-10-06  6:43     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] sim: Check known getopt definition existence Tsukasa OI
2022-10-12 16:28       ` Tom de Vries
2022-10-12 17:03         ` Tsukasa OI
2022-10-12 17:08           ` Tom de Vries
2022-10-12 17:20             ` Tom de Vries
2022-10-13  9:50         ` Tsukasa OI
2022-10-23 12:16       ` Mike Frysinger
2022-10-27  2:02         ` Tsukasa OI
2023-01-03  3:12           ` Mike Frysinger
2023-01-03  8:47             ` Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  6:43     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] sim: Initialize pbb_br_* by default Tsukasa OI
2022-10-11 14:20     ` [PATCH v3 0/5] sim: Suppress warnings if built with Clang Andrew Burgess
2022-10-11 16:40     ` Tom de Vries
2022-10-11 18:02       ` Tsukasa OI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k05efqjy.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).