From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D26553851C36 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:37:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D26553851C36 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ludo@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmBaG-00041Q-4L; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 03:37:08 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37200 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jmBaF-0001Lr-A6; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 03:37:07 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] guile: Add support for Guile 2.2. References: <87wo4bypk6.fsf@gnu.org> <20200615151453.795-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20200615151453.795-2-ludo@gnu.org> <831rmg2ri2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d05w15fs.fsf@tromey.com> <83bllfziya.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 2 Messidor an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:37:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83bllfziya.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:08:13 +0300") Message-ID: <87k103ik0v.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:37:09 -0000 Hi, Eli Zaretskii skribis: >> >>>>> "Eli" =3D=3D Eli Zaretskii writes: >>=20 >> Eli> I still am not convinced we should remove the description of those >> Eli> functions from the manual, but I'll let others speak up if they have >> Eli> an opinion. >>=20 >> When do we plan to remove them? >>=20 >> Maybe it would be better to leave the docs and say "these will be >> removed in gdb 11", then once 10 branches we could go ahead with that. > > Those were my thoughts, yes. And also to state that they are only > available with Guile 2.0. OK, sounds good to me. >> IIUC maybe they are sometimes needed by Guile 2.0? They=E2=80=99re the only way to change the size of the memory port=E2=80=99= s internal buffer on 2.0, but I can=E2=80=99t think of a use case where one really nee= ds that control. >> How long is that expected to be around? If this goes into gdb 10, my suggestion is to remove Guile 2.0 support in gdb 11. We=E2=80=99re keeping it just to make the transition smoother. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.