public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, marcan@marcan.st
Subject: Re: GDB 13.2 and GDB 14 releases...
Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 16:15:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lei8w04k.fsf@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZE/TlICUiUu7zjiF@adacore.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1252 bytes --]


Joel Brobecker via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

> Hi Simon,
>
>> IMO, it's better to make regular releases than waiting to have a certain
>> amount of changes.  The changes currently in master might not look
>> important to me, but maybe someone else is eagerly waiting for a
>> specific fix or feature to be officially released.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. That makes sense too. Do people want us
> to switch to this kind of approach?

Yeah, I'd definitely appreciate it for Gentoo. In fact, when you sent
the first email in this thread, I'd just been wondering if I should ask
about a point release at least.

Distros in general don't need a release to be action-packed (crammed
full of features), it's better that we get bug fixes out faster and
not have to worry about cherry-picking ourselves. It also makes
debugging any regressions a lot easier if the delta is a bit smaller ;)

I've CC'd marcan as well because he recently had some frustration
working on Asahi Linux when it turned out something had been fixed in
master a good while ago but hadn't propagated into a release.

The only disadvantage I see is if there's too much work to cut a release. But
the fix to that is to make releases easier, I think.

best,
sam

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 377 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-01 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-29 20:15 Joel Brobecker
2023-05-01 13:37 ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-01 14:58   ` Joel Brobecker
2023-05-01 15:15     ` Sam James [this message]
2023-05-02  6:55       ` Hector Martin
2023-05-01 16:39     ` Simon Marchi
2023-05-02  9:23     ` Luis Machado
2023-05-01 16:16   ` John Baldwin
2023-05-02 12:57 ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lei8w04k.fsf@gentoo.org \
    --to=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=marcan@marcan.st \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).