From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2484 invoked by alias); 16 May 2014 20:31:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2473 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2014 20:31:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 May 2014 20:30:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4GKUuFU007136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 16 May 2014 16:30:56 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-182.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.182]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4GKUksb004138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 May 2014 16:30:55 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Simon Marchi Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Exit code of exited inferiors in -list-thread-groups References: <1400018204-29559-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 20:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1400018204-29559-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> (Simon Marchi's message of "Tue, 13 May 2014 17:56:44 -0400") Message-ID: <87mweh31qi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00314.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi writes: Simon> This one was also from a year ago, I would like to make sure it is still Simon> OK. Simon> + if (inferior->has_exit_code) Simon> + ui_out_field_string (uiout, "exit-code", Simon> + int_string (inferior->exit_code, 8, 0, 0, 1)); Why not the simpler ui_out_field_int? Going out of the way to print it in octal seems a bit odd for a machine interface. Tom