From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2E16385B508 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 17:15:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F2E16385B508 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1678986905; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5RLkrARiv2PU4AlFr/laUDZdCitKsOWIjMKx9lb0n4Q=; b=Z3FvC5+50zcP2uYg8W0lmVRypoGN8K7v9xAmE3kLN3kXEEeCwCWTxRCMZS9aCrH1DQD96I knSbJAmJcUgoKSWF5Pv+GQUlbbAcYgRUWWNiEf6ibYE1HsSF3joQMvi+KCQaEBHzU2vfdV TpHq8PslOrBvagIAlxk4DJ4pkvvA09I= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-371-DB1enZDaNcG73BKDMa6o4Q-1; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:15:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DB1enZDaNcG73BKDMa6o4Q-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id p36-20020a056402502400b004bb926a3d54so3989919eda.2 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:15:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678986903; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5RLkrARiv2PU4AlFr/laUDZdCitKsOWIjMKx9lb0n4Q=; b=6LXnWkprjuTs6MiOo6lCT4eEyPJvg1OccTB5igZu5AzKO2cyWHz1gfThJ8HkqFXhBT eoIk08QTZssz9vZLGHQrXLNr8IhMWt6XgizRXlwZLuoHrn7dyaSDA2zbyQQLx6LSCP6L CTTCWhQ3b/RxYz/kMU+rfoOBattHF8YwZ6IZ2Xd4NyXCVew/Xebk7g5XZ+7J44x7b9iX MZoYPu2If57w+lwHkTuMDRFJAFuuPMV5Qnscp6bBULP1Xw1BTw09YSF87ll+adoawsCz CSIz+H+l5LB2FhcxG130HFB5VnGB2eOZImQ5JVr0Qr8rDFiqxxQDtTYnBLq99csfWIFu 5z/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKX6fA87uJr97yvALYQwwF9INgNzYMAqGcGThLN5jdeZY0id3ped yYQUfyCMExxdM0P0sE/o8RA0lOYCraFu0kP+e6scphxrasiYUVJhDpsPZXegf9qoF1fCeU2YF4L w4fudZ8tZXqMamMZlrwnFtgh1UFQ++Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a0c1:b0:92a:7178:ab56 with SMTP id bh1-20020a170906a0c100b0092a7178ab56mr11100402ejb.39.1678986903089; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:15:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/UHF5gSu+a5qSQojjTiop+1GVy7M+5BVlGWQiu9F6A9Q94CEX0Gaehe7oinIWUxokeFQ+a8g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a0c1:b0:92a:7178:ab56 with SMTP id bh1-20020a170906a0c100b0092a7178ab56mr11100392ejb.39.1678986902856; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (95.72.115.87.dyn.plus.net. [87.115.72.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v20-20020a170906565400b008d427df3245sm4086304ejr.58.2023.03.16.10.15.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:15:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Burgess To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 01/13] gdb/doc: extended documentation for inferior function calls In-Reply-To: <83edrr220g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83edrr220g.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 17:15:00 +0000 Message-ID: <87o7osehyj.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: Andrew Burgess >> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:17:57 +0000 >> From: Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches >> >> I noticed that the documentation for inferior function calls doesn't >> say much about what happens if/when an inferior function call is >> interrupted, i.e. it doesn't describe what the dummy frame looks like >> on the stack, or how GDB behaves when the inferior is continued and >> reaches the dummy frame. >> >> This commit aims to add some of this missing information. > > Thanks. > >> +If a called function is interrupted for any reason, and the stack is >> +not unwound (due to @code{set unwind-on-terminating-exception on} or >> +@code{set unwindonsignal on}), > > Please add here a cross-reference to here these settings are described > in the manual. > > Otherwise, this is OK. I made this fix and pushed this patch. Thanks, Andrew