From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-106323-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14141 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2013 15:36:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 14125 invoked by uid 89); 14 Oct 2013 15:36:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:36:30 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9EFaT5r001053	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:36:29 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-54.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.54])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9EFaRnn015013	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:36:28 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Ondrej Oprala <ooprala@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] poison "private"
References: <1381339053-14519-1-git-send-email-ooprala@redhat.com>	<1381339053-14519-6-git-send-email-ooprala@redhat.com>	<525BB010.3050105@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:36:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <525BB010.3050105@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 14	Oct 2013 09:49:20 +0100")
Message-ID: <87ob6r3lvo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

Pedro> BTW, I think it'd be much clearer if we renamed away all this
Pedro> 'private' wording, like, say:

Pedro>   struct private_thread_info -> struct target_thread_info

For the specific case of struct private_inferior, I think it would be
better to change the code to use the existing registry API.

Tom