From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125705 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2018 21:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 125675 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2018 21:14:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:402 X-HELO: gateway34.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway34.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway34.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.148.212) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 21:14:23 +0000 Received: from cm15.websitewelcome.com (cm15.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.9]) by gateway34.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D408FE4C7CA for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:14:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id 7RzMgwaMK8YaU7RzdgPYEE; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:14:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/LiKh9m4zKBDP9x1o6WnCd2UafYBy6IFT7Ywiohad4s=; b=CtaQejQnBA2BYeA+SSyAT7C0yH z1iqsNsKkQcQAUDn7Uqe7vobWUWT2eBlPFGn4hllbEPINLnBjWDPUD73KwYjxIRYOC+c50RkuBF4X qkZRFeBNet3KPc3GGzcz6JLC1; Received: from 97-122-190-66.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.190.66]:44566 helo=pokyo) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1g7RzL-003KPa-Ia; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:13:51 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Avoid find_thread_ptid with null_ptid References: <20181001103252.5150-1-palves@redhat.com> <20181001103252.5150-2-palves@redhat.com> <87d0stll3u.fsf@tromey.com> <4a78c0f6-9d0a-2ee0-30cb-39f950f5fec5@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 21:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4a78c0f6-9d0a-2ee0-30cb-39f950f5fec5@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 2 Oct 2018 18:08:17 +0100") Message-ID: <87pnwsjbld.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: [...] Pedro> But I can add it if you prefer. No, that's fine. >> I wonder if it is possible for an RSP implementation to say that the >> inferior has PID 0. Pedro> GDB would break down badly. Throughout we assume pid == 0 means the Pedro> inferior/process is not started. Thanks. Tom