public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Reorganize code to handle TYPE_CODE_{STRUCT,UNION} on 'c_type_print_base'
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87po7kc1cu.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f8ee5f9-6f73-107f-c9d7-d6c31b5be98c@ericsson.com> (Simon	Marchi's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:54:55 -0500")

On Monday, December 11 2017, Simon Marchi wrote:

> Hi Sergio,
>
> LGTM, with some nits.

Thanks for the review.

> On 2017-12-11 02:57 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> diff --git a/gdb/c-typeprint.c b/gdb/c-typeprint.c
>> index f3c3e7d706..46c814fae8 100644
>> --- a/gdb/c-typeprint.c
>> +++ b/gdb/c-typeprint.c
>> @@ -875,6 +875,458 @@ output_access_specifier (struct ui_file *stream,
>>    return last_access;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Return true is an access label (i.e., "public:", "private:",
>> +   "protected:") needs to be printed for TYPE.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +need_access_label_p (struct type *type)
>> +{
>> +  bool need_access_label = false;
>> +  int i, j;
>> +  int len, len2;
>> +
>> +  if (TYPE_DECLARED_CLASS (type))
>> +    {
>> +      QUIT;
>> +      len = TYPE_NFIELDS (type);
>> +      for (i = TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type); i < len; i++)
>> +	if (!TYPE_FIELD_PRIVATE (type, i))
>> +	  {
>> +	    need_access_label = true;
>> +	    break;
>> +	  }
>> +      QUIT;
>> +      if (!need_access_label)
>> +	{
>> +	  len2 = TYPE_NFN_FIELDS (type);
>> +	  for (j = 0; j < len2; j++)
>> +	    {
>> +	      len = TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST_LENGTH (type, j);
>> +	      for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> +		if (!TYPE_FN_FIELD_PRIVATE (TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST1 (type,
>> +								j), i))
>> +		  {
>> +		    need_access_label = true;
>> +		    break;
>> +		  }
>> +	      if (need_access_label)
>> +		break;
>> +	    }
>> +	}
>> +      QUIT;
>> +      if (!need_access_label)
>> +	{
>> +	  for (i = 0; i < TYPE_TYPEDEF_FIELD_COUNT (type); ++i)
>> +	    {
>> +	      if (!TYPE_TYPEDEF_FIELD_PRIVATE (type, i))
>> +		{
>> +		  need_access_label = true;
>> +		  break;
>> +		}
>> +	    }
>> +	}
>> +    }
>> +  else
>> +    {
>> +      QUIT;
>> +      len = TYPE_NFIELDS (type);
>> +      for (i = TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type); i < len; i++)
>> +	if (TYPE_FIELD_PRIVATE (type, i)
>> +	    || TYPE_FIELD_PROTECTED (type, i))
>> +	  {
>> +	    need_access_label = true;
>> +	    break;
>> +	  }
>> +      QUIT;
>> +      if (!need_access_label)
>> +	{
>> +	  len2 = TYPE_NFN_FIELDS (type);
>> +	  for (j = 0; j < len2; j++)
>> +	    {
>> +	      QUIT;
>> +	      len = TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST_LENGTH (type, j);
>> +	      for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> +		if (TYPE_FN_FIELD_PROTECTED (TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST1 (type,
>> +								 j), i)
>> +		    || TYPE_FN_FIELD_PRIVATE (TYPE_FN_FIELDLIST1 (type,
>> +								  j),
>> +					      i))
>> +		  {
>> +		    need_access_label = true;
>> +		    break;
>> +		  }
>> +	      if (need_access_label)
>> +		break;
>> +	    }
>> +	}
>> +      QUIT;
>> +      if (!need_access_label)
>> +	{
>> +	  for (i = 0; i < TYPE_TYPEDEF_FIELD_COUNT (type); ++i)
>> +	    {
>> +	      if (TYPE_TYPEDEF_FIELD_PROTECTED (type, i)
>> +		  || TYPE_TYPEDEF_FIELD_PRIVATE (type, i))
>> +		{
>> +		  need_access_label = true;
>> +		  break;
>> +		}
>> +	    }
>> +	}
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  return need_access_label;
>
> It seems to me that you could return immediately when you detect that a label is
> needed.  It would allow removing a bunch of if (!need_access_label).

Done.

>> @@ -898,10 +1350,8 @@ c_type_print_base (struct type *type, struct ui_file *stream,
>>  		   int show, int level, const struct type_print_options *flags)
>>  {
>>    int i;
>> -  int len, real_len;
>> -  enum access_specifier section_type;
>> -  int need_access_label = 0;
>> -  int j, len2;
>> +  int len;
>> +  int j;
>
> j is unused.

Removed.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-11 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-21 16:07 [PATCH] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-21 16:16 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-21 16:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-21 17:00   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-21 19:14     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-26 19:27 ` Tom Tromey
2017-11-27 19:54   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-27 22:20     ` Tom Tromey
2017-11-28  0:39       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-28 21:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29  3:28   ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-12-04 15:03   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-04 15:41     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-12-04 16:47       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-08 21:32     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 15:43   ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-11 18:59     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 20:45       ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-11 21:07         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 22:42           ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-11 22:50             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 23:46               ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-12  0:25                 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-12  0:52                   ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-12  1:25                     ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-12 15:50                       ` John Baldwin
2017-12-12 17:04                         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option (and do some code reorg) Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 19:58   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] Reorganize code to handle TYPE_CODE_{STRUCT,UNION} on 'c_type_print_base' Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 20:55     ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-11 23:05       ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2017-12-11 19:58   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 21:50     ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-11 23:24       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-12  1:32         ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-12  6:19           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-12 18:14             ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-12 18:40               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-12 20:12                 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-11 23:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option (and do some code reorg) Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-11 23:44   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-12  0:27     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-12  0:29       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-12  1:59     ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-12  3:39     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-12-11 23:44   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] Reorganize code to handle TYPE_CODE_{STRUCT,UNION} on 'c_type_print_base' Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13  3:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option (and do some code reorg) Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13  3:17   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] Reorganize code to handle TYPE_CODE_{STRUCT,UNION} on 'c_type_print_base' Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13  3:17   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13  4:50     ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-13 16:42       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13 16:17     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-12-13 17:14       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13 16:19     ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-13 17:13       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13 20:36         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13 21:22           ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-13 21:30             ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-13 21:34             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-13 16:20     ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-13 17:41       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-14  2:48 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option (and do some code reorg) Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-14  2:48   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-14 14:19     ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-14 20:31       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-14 14:50     ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-14 20:29       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-14 16:30     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-12-14  2:48   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Reorganize code to handle TYPE_CODE_{STRUCT,UNION} on 'c_type_print_base' Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-15  1:12 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option (and do some code reorg) Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-15  1:12   ` [PATCH v7 1/2] Reorganize code to handle TYPE_CODE_{STRUCT,UNION} on 'c_type_print_base' Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-15  1:13   ` [PATCH v7 2/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-15 17:24     ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-15 20:04       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-15 20:11   ` [PATCH v7 0/2] Implement pahole-like 'ptype /o' option (and do some code reorg) Sergio Durigan Junior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87po7kc1cu.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).