From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24449 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2013 15:54:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24420 invoked by uid 89); 6 Dec 2013 15:54:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 15:54:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rB6FsMBg032329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:54:22 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-93.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.93]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rB6FsKcY025980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:54:21 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] remove some sym_probe_fns methods References: <1386100019-27379-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1386100019-27379-3-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 15:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:24:54 -0200") Message-ID: <87pppakmab.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Durigan Junior writes: Sergio> On Thursday, December 05 2013, I wrote: >> This patch is great and needed, thanks a lot. The cleanup is more than >> welcome. Sergio> Tom, looking at this patch, I don't see a (strong) dependency on the Sergio> other patches of this series. Can this single patch go in? It would be Sergio> a nice cleanup, as I said above. Sure. I'll push it in a while. Tom