From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A1D3858409 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 11:09:17 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 10A1D3858409 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1688468956; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3M2bC/dZvAJHq9QiGBeMrmND2LRDFGN78TFDyWWszcs=; b=YNhbOku6vysBX7T0bLmMKqx6/Hy94KlxlkgjZbZspyUlzMBlB762SkvWc8NnmVJjtGWLbw O4tCdfGDhJHd0c8JWwW1NnDZ9WpRDlLSv4TsZHX7w8wQzOgYjnJo2QQ6iZ9jXif0FGJnEd 4oXDOIksLI5e+kn+KFNP+6sx1yRx+uw= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-108-0HLDGpTBOhiyrfR0hivWRQ-1; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 07:09:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0HLDGpTBOhiyrfR0hivWRQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f41a04a297so30444765e9.3 for ; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 04:09:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688468954; x=1691060954; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3M2bC/dZvAJHq9QiGBeMrmND2LRDFGN78TFDyWWszcs=; b=XgOZrEnZ9oYWW01HM9H3Jvlg2FlWGAPikszESC3zglcVaGMxVrge45hmhpp4GN01VR KXZX5g4R6hH04ZnIYuCCoHZzjyIQv8t60bbSu+fNSlr8Dls1TxMb6W6x5/jyb2F2H5oM LMsxVIZ6zx1ZwnDnMtIHxtqX9g7nshRCX6L+OprCRK1ItIaP78WqdTkt7HJ5n/273TiO xXRyE9imwJ5u5HWMnpFtrecmVfzdquOUtJTwbpUXoRPiVqZpcVuvjP7Fpbs4pUXG7uDR RHjErPk1dgrCROgnti3kWeKsXAYss751F9UK1mYidpQqqwys3bOmQjBM3JjjS/lczoyu jAJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwp8n/W76buN08TLpEilFOgTRTMnT49UblgEnb7pD6y6aShXSAH ZPnX6hzVoioRUPoVMMuLZHVpdHm3V1yeGdHhjuGjRBTcJHoW5/GZOgt+zWq5BfpGLRnXKDi6D8U TWwJKAqwCQ3m9BoMu70t2vhx+wSsdp19O7QI3zGg8CqU4wE7BwF8D0GAJRORsMvQfw4q5rRncLY eBGbWv/A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3787:b0:3f9:b2c6:2cd with SMTP id o7-20020a05600c378700b003f9b2c602cdmr9690001wmr.15.1688468954485; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 04:09:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4LKhKi1xxoshgCZ3w5RetqJiCUJwv0tJBOaliI3AR7+ZWfJVKFhyf4bRoD1fG0vV0780FMyg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3787:b0:3f9:b2c6:2cd with SMTP id o7-20020a05600c378700b003f9b2c602cdmr9689985wmr.15.1688468954119; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 04:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (2.72.115.87.dyn.plus.net. [87.115.72.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a10-20020a1cf00a000000b003f8fb02c413sm29902718wmb.8.2023.07.04.04.09.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jul 2023 04:09:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Burgess To: Matheus Branco Borella via Gdb-patches , aburgess@readhat.com Cc: dark.ryu.550@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/2] Add __repr__() implementation to a few Python types In-Reply-To: <87v8fwyfw7.fsf@redhat.com> References: <20230607170556.1028183-1-dark.ryu.550@gmail.com> <87v8fwyfw7.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 12:09:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87r0pokk6f.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Andrew Burgess writes: > Matheus Branco Borella via Gdb-patches > writes: > >> All of the changes look good in my oppinion. I'm still getting used to the hang >> of things, so I really appreciate the effort you put into making my patch more >> presentable! So I think it should be good to go? > > Do you have a copyright assignment in place? If not then, given the > size of the change, I think you will need one before this could be > merged. Matheus, Thanks for getting the copyright assignment sorted. I've now gone ahead and merged both patches in this series. Thanks, Andrew