From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34CB83858C00 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:31:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 34CB83858C00 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1674837088; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HUd0qzoocz0GbvNLokZkZFpbrMIpPp0RfGiT2SA8e+c=; b=BFoKdsRCZjpylOFE7goESlBsmZFZgGEOF7gxZNHF4dv43f4+O0XbhRkt014B7TzK9chkVT w8SsMSLD8BsWP/kgi6fM4elfG0HsOiuzxkeuUBktwGl4ZWXE3Adczp5oHTgxdlecjx6+Kc 6gGF46TkAJa6SofGTjEFUb6i65aWUZA= Received: from mail-oi1-f197.google.com (mail-oi1-f197.google.com [209.85.167.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-657-T25UPZm4PIKH9UlrDrf62Q-1; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:31:27 -0500 X-MC-Unique: T25UPZm4PIKH9UlrDrf62Q-1 Received: by mail-oi1-f197.google.com with SMTP id bj26-20020a056808199a00b0036eb714b8e6so2056845oib.11 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:31:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HUd0qzoocz0GbvNLokZkZFpbrMIpPp0RfGiT2SA8e+c=; b=i8gRW+ExPVdJW25oChODS6SxHJ2dtOv2aY/kEuaNvSTffO1kVDxbT/VTlqQkp8f3ks 0BTKla2cZP6nOaTYvtShWsILvBRBITq6whZdgttKtd7nDyFaeyf3GO7C486x8C0EmZax M7tRNvCEN6t9GGPVYWY2YU/HeOcb93JAJ/R1mFX4RslsFt/kuEcNi33mE07Nhj6sVmyc bDc3xLqxiJRukajiegFDaBopKQEsCYA5L9fPFwYB9lPwXq4AToQioj6eEtdhwvsD+Fd+ D41sIX3gmLAnkEXCWp4FPhNIwTcBP7OxRPokTaaGn36KO7WgA/539LjbhUcj0ZKtcZAe qOkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpvKsc50l6RNlMtwZKLSaUzrdN5pbcwCQXWYyZ2K8Wqe9mbYVfq FGeQkI5hkkdyZKzzISyLtFNbSicLhEM7dAj1z+UkPgb+e14ls+vvxXYiGj2XxpYb+jjVcC003Hg 8U/XmEuGPO3j9/C3iBIwJpA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:105:b0:36c:9c19:2667 with SMTP id b5-20020a056808010500b0036c9c192667mr16636894oie.50.1674837086733; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:31:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsQ5QxDj81kQbu553u6aOvw7rEWXAOOBSPrJ1P7YX2UXGJSYslcb8WqbHgSVhPP5TD/EnnaNA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:105:b0:36c:9c19:2667 with SMTP id b5-20020a056808010500b0036c9c192667mr16636882oie.50.1674837086497; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:31:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (95.72.115.87.dyn.plus.net. [87.115.72.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6-20020a375306000000b006fa4ac86bfbsm3089240qkb.55.2023.01.27.08.31.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:31:26 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Burgess To: Tom Tromey , Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] Mixed bag of TUI tests and fixes In-Reply-To: <878rhqv0n9.fsf@tromey.com> References: <878rhqv0n9.fsf@tromey.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:31:24 +0000 Message-ID: <87r0vgueg3.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Tom Tromey writes: >>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches writes: > > Andrew> Changes since v1: > Andrew> - I've pushed 7 of the original patches. These were either smaller > Andrew> testsuite only patches, or small, obvious GDB fixes, > > Andrew> - I've rebased the remaining patches onto HEAD of upstream. > > I skimmed through these and the overall direction all seems fine, no > real comments from me. Thank you for doing this. I didn't read the > patches in *too* much detail but I think you should still go ahead and > check them in. I went ahead and pushed these. Thanks, Andrew