public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/mi: add no-history stop reason
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 12:04:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0wbygct.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230102155645.66733-1-blarsen@redhat.com>

Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

> When executing in reverse and runs out of recorded history, GDB prints
> a warning to the user, but does not add a reason in the stopped record,
> for example:
>
> *stopped,frame={addr="0x000000000040113e",func="main",args=[],file="/home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.c",fullname="/home/blarsen/Documents/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.c",line="27",arch="i386:x86-64"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="1"
>
> This problem was reported as record/29260.
>
> This commit adds the reason no-history to the record, making it easier
> for interfaces using the mi interpreter to report the result.
>
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29260
> ---
>  gdb/NEWS            | 5 +++++
>  gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 2 ++
>  gdb/infrun.c        | 5 ++++-
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

I think this should have a test added to gdb.reverse/.

>
> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
> index e61f06081de..3673bed8f46 100644
> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -5,6 +5,11 @@
>  
>  * MI version 1 has been removed.
>  
> +* MI changes
> +
> +** mi now reports 'no_history' as a stop reason when hitting the end of the

s/no_history/no-history/

> +   reverse execution history.
> +
>  *** Changes in GDB 13
>  
>  * MI version 1 is deprecated, and will be removed in GDB 14.
> diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> index a72b2b9eb26..8982151a7e3 100644
> --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> @@ -30851,6 +30851,8 @@ The inferior returned from a system call.  This is reported when
>  @item exec
>  The inferior called @code{exec}.  This is reported when @code{catch exec}
>  (@pxref{Set Catchpoints}) has been used.
> +@item no-history
> +There isn't enough history recorded to continue reverse execution.
>  @end table
>  
>  The @var{id} field identifies the global thread ID of the thread
> diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
> index d5f97e33625..601d1a54701 100644
> --- a/gdb/infrun.c
> +++ b/gdb/infrun.c
> @@ -8406,7 +8406,10 @@ print_signal_received_reason (struct ui_out *uiout, enum gdb_signal siggnal)
>  void
>  print_no_history_reason (struct ui_out *uiout)
>  {
> -  uiout->text ("\nNo more reverse-execution history.\n");
> +  if (uiout->is_mi_like_p ())
> +    uiout->field_string ("reason", "no-history");

If we look at how similar cases are handled in e.g. breakpoint.c, then
we see that GDB looks up all these stop reason strings by calling
async_reason_lookup.

So, I think we should add a new reason to 'enum async_reply_reason' in
mi/mi-common.h.  The 'no-history' string should be added to
'async_reason_string_lookup' in mi-common.c, and then you should call
async_reason_lookup here.

Thanks,
Andrew
> +  else
> +    uiout->text ("\nNo more reverse-execution history.\n");
>  }
>  
>  /* Print current location without a level number, if we have changed
> -- 
> 2.39.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-03 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-02 15:56 Bruno Larsen
2023-01-03 12:04 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2023-01-04 14:40   ` Bruno Larsen
2023-01-10 15:36 ` Pedro Alves
2023-01-10 15:39   ` Bruno Larsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r0wbygct.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=blarsen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).