* [PATCH] Fix null pointer representations
@ 2022-09-13 13:55 TaiseiIto
2022-09-20 18:49 ` Tom Tromey
2022-10-14 23:42 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: TaiseiIto @ 2022-09-13 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: tom, TaiseiIto
Since "NULL" and "0" are used to represent invalid address in function
"gdbarch_find_by_info" in "binutils-gdb/gdb/arch-utils.c", I modified
them to "nullptr".
---
gdb/arch-utils.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/arch-utils.c b/gdb/arch-utils.c
index 9bd4f0ddae6..01111b69d6b 100644
--- a/gdb/arch-utils.c
+++ b/gdb/arch-utils.c
@@ -1326,13 +1326,13 @@ gdbarch_find_by_info (struct gdbarch_info info)
gdbarch_info_fill (&info);
/* Must have found some sort of architecture. */
- gdb_assert (info.bfd_arch_info != NULL);
+ gdb_assert (info.bfd_arch_info != nullptr);
if (gdbarch_debug)
{
gdb_printf (gdb_stdlog,
"gdbarch_find_by_info: info.bfd_arch_info %s\n",
- (info.bfd_arch_info != NULL
+ (info.bfd_arch_info != nullptr
? info.bfd_arch_info->printable_name
: "(null)"));
gdb_printf (gdb_stdlog,
@@ -1351,16 +1351,16 @@ gdbarch_find_by_info (struct gdbarch_info info)
/* Find the tdep code that knows about this architecture. */
for (rego = gdbarch_registry;
- rego != NULL;
+ rego != nullptr;
rego = rego->next)
if (rego->bfd_architecture == info.bfd_arch_info->arch)
break;
- if (rego == NULL)
+ if (rego == nullptr)
{
if (gdbarch_debug)
gdb_printf (gdb_stdlog, "gdbarch_find_by_info: "
"No matching architecture\n");
- return 0;
+ return nullptr;
}
/* Ask the tdep code for an architecture that matches "info". */
@@ -1368,12 +1368,12 @@ gdbarch_find_by_info (struct gdbarch_info info)
/* Did the tdep code like it? No. Reject the change and revert to
the old architecture. */
- if (new_gdbarch == NULL)
+ if (new_gdbarch == nullptr)
{
if (gdbarch_debug)
gdb_printf (gdb_stdlog, "gdbarch_find_by_info: "
"Target rejected architecture\n");
- return NULL;
+ return nullptr;
}
/* Is this a pre-existing architecture (as determined by already
@@ -1390,10 +1390,10 @@ gdbarch_find_by_info (struct gdbarch_info info)
new_gdbarch->bfd_arch_info->printable_name);
/* Find the existing arch in the list. */
for (list = ®o->arches;
- (*list) != NULL && (*list)->gdbarch != new_gdbarch;
+ (*list) != nullptr && (*list)->gdbarch != new_gdbarch;
list = &(*list)->next);
/* It had better be in the list of architectures. */
- gdb_assert ((*list) != NULL && (*list)->gdbarch == new_gdbarch);
+ gdb_assert ((*list) != nullptr && (*list)->gdbarch == new_gdbarch);
/* Unlink SELF. */
self = (*list);
(*list) = self->next;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix null pointer representations
2022-09-13 13:55 [PATCH] Fix null pointer representations TaiseiIto
@ 2022-09-20 18:49 ` Tom Tromey
2022-10-14 23:42 ` Tom Tromey
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2022-09-20 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: TaiseiIto via Gdb-patches; +Cc: TaiseiIto, tom
>>>>> TaiseiIto via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> Since "NULL" and "0" are used to represent invalid address in function
> "gdbarch_find_by_info" in "binutils-gdb/gdb/arch-utils.c", I modified
> them to "nullptr".
Thank you, this is ok.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix null pointer representations
2022-09-13 13:55 [PATCH] Fix null pointer representations TaiseiIto
2022-09-20 18:49 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2022-10-14 23:42 ` Tom Tromey
2022-10-17 13:18 ` Tom Tromey
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2022-10-14 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: TaiseiIto; +Cc: gdb-patches, tom
>>>>> TaiseiIto <taisei1212@outlook.jp> writes:
> Since "NULL" and "0" are used to represent invalid address in function
> "gdbarch_find_by_info" in "binutils-gdb/gdb/arch-utils.c", I modified
> them to "nullptr".
I don't think there was a reply to this updated patch?
Anyway it is ok, please check it in. Thank you.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix null pointer representations
2022-10-14 23:42 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2022-10-17 13:18 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2022-10-17 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: TaiseiIto, gdb-patches
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> writes:
>>>>> TaiseiIto <taisei1212@outlook.jp> writes:
>> Since "NULL" and "0" are used to represent invalid address in function
>> "gdbarch_find_by_info" in "binutils-gdb/gdb/arch-utils.c", I modified
>> them to "nullptr".
Tom> I don't think there was a reply to this updated patch?
Tom> Anyway it is ok, please check it in. Thank you.
I discussed this off-list with the author, and I'm going to push it now.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-17 13:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-13 13:55 [PATCH] Fix null pointer representations TaiseiIto
2022-09-20 18:49 ` Tom Tromey
2022-10-14 23:42 ` Tom Tromey
2022-10-17 13:18 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).