From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14298 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2014 21:23:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14273 invoked by uid 89); 25 Sep 2014 21:23:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:23:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8PLNMq0001660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:23:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (dhcp-10-15-16-169.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.169]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8PLNMZK010468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:23:22 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Pedro Alves Cc: GDB Patches , Gary Benson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove support for "rtld_" prefix on solib-svr4 probes References: <1411581801-19126-1-git-send-email-sergiodj@redhat.com> <5423F08B.1040409@redhat.com> <87bnq3h1gf.fsf_-_@redhat.com> <54248579.8030606@redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <54248579.8030606@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:13:29 +0100") Message-ID: <87r3yzfl86.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00748.txt.bz2 On Thursday, September 25 2014, Pedro Alves wrote: > There's RHEL (at least, per the comment) 6.4 too, which isn't EOL'ed, > though. It's reasonable to expect that people may still want to > build/test upstream gdb on those? Damn, I forgot to talk about RHEL. But yeah, RHEL-6.x is not EOL'ed, but the GDB that comes with it is from Red Hat as well, and contains all the necessary patches to deal with whatever "internal idiosyncrasy" that it may need. OTOH, I know Gary has been using RHEL-6.5 to test his upstream patches, so to answer your question, it is still possible that people may still want to buid/test upstream GDB there. My opinion is that we shouldn't need to worry about internals of each distro (I know we *have to do that* sometimes, but that's not an excuse), so I still hold the cleanup patch for approval :-). -- Sergio GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/