From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gateway21.websitewelcome.com (gateway21.websitewelcome.com [192.185.45.212]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76AA43858D28 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:00:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 76AA43858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from cm13.websitewelcome.com (cm13.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.6]) by gateway21.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB1A400F31F3 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 11:00:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id pZ9RmNs4JHrvkpZ9Rm9WaI; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 11:00:13 -0600 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=I/iiHxKI23GOekEsTHlZMO2NyYuTDoH9eNpsZHJBmwA=; b=YykgTde+rxE4nXDOeev8Ge5YVt lSJDiFy26CdoT0WJnmWRDgKd7+068XbGCPWV+YcxJ2XxXf/t44r1yNie94lbMurlp1y0TSIZiHorK zwqddWyxibH+Tj6jiiRctSzQ7; Received: from 97-122-68-246.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.68.246]:40414 helo=localhost.localdomain) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mpZ9R-003Omw-13; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:00:13 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Tom de Vries Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/32] Rewrite the DWARF "partial" reader References: <20211104180907.2360627-1-tom@tromey.com> <4a288a6a-63c4-e36e-da20-01ae3fd0955c@suse.de> <87a6i31woz.fsf@tromey.com> <87mtlwx8p6.fsf@tromey.com> <2e54aac8-8f1a-e9ac-9530-c5770ff9a379@suse.de> <878rxfyh5e.fsf@tromey.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:00:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Tom de Vries's message of "Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:56:16 +0100") Message-ID: <87sfvmx0wz.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.68.246 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1mpZ9R-003Omw-13 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-68-246.hlrn.qwest.net (localhost.localdomain) [97.122.68.246]:40414 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3025.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NEUTRAL, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:00:26 -0000 >> For me, with this test, the compiler doesn't mention test.c at all in >> its output, so even the unmodified gdb can't find it. Tom> [ I've sent an off-list message to discuss how to reproduce this. ] I applied your test case and: $ runtest --target_board=fission-dwp gdb.base/include-main.exp [...] # of expected passes 2 I'm using the Fedora 34 system compiler. $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 11.2.1 20210728 (Red Hat 11.2.1-1) Tom> FWIW, I think this is sufficiently cornercase that it's not worth Tom> blocking the trunk commit of the branch. Filing this in bugzilla to Tom> deal with later and adding a KFAIL in the test should be sufficient. For me, if it's reproducible with C or C++, then it should be fixed. For Ada, I think it's less important simply because I think nobody is using fission/dwp there. Tom