From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add support for the readnever concept
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 04:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shcvgj55.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6765d36f-8603-9cd3-0476-801a5bfe0865@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:52:58 +0000")
On Thursday, November 30 2017, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 11/30/2017 12:25 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
>> - Split off the fix to 'symbol-file' command argument parsing. This
>> patch depends on it
>> (<https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-11/msg00799.html>).
>
> This info above conflicts with ...
>
>> While implementing the code for the 'symbol-file' command, I noticed a
>> bug in 'symbol_file_command': GDB adds the symbol file before
>> finishing parsing all the options, which means that the position of an
>> option in the command impacts whether it will be considered or not. I
>> changed the code there in order to only add the symbol file after all
>> options have been parsed.
>
> ... this info here. The patch still has that bit...
You're right, I'll remove this bit since there's a whole new patch (with
all its glorious versions) to implement that.
>>
>> It's also worth mentioning that this patch tests whether GDB correctly
>> fails to initialize if both '--readnow' and '--readnever' options are
>> passed. We didn't have any infrastructure to test that, so I added a
>> new version of 'gdb_spawn', called 'gdb_spawn_ignore_error', which can
>> be used to start a GDB that will fail without compromising the entire
>> testcase.
>
> This is stale.
Removed the part that refers to 'gdb_spawn_ignore_error'.
>> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2017-11-29 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>> Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>>
>> * gdb.base/readnever.c, gdb.base/readnever.exp: New files.
>> * lib/gdb.exp (default_gdb_spawn): Add 'ignore_error'
>> parameter. Handle case when 'ignore_error' is set.
>> (gdb_spawn_ignore_error): New function.
>
> Also stale...
Removed the part about lib/gdb.exp.
>> @@ -699,7 +700,8 @@ coff_symfile_read (struct objfile *objfile, symfile_add_flags symfile_flags)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, coff_locate_sections, (void *) info);
>> + if (!readnever_symbol_files && !(objfile->flags & OBJF_READNEVER))
>> + bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, coff_locate_sections, (void *) info);
>
> I realized something: is it really ever possible to get here with
>
> readnever_symbol_files && !(objfile->flags & OBJF_READNEVER)
>
> ??
>
> If readnever_symbol_files is set, then it'll have been propagated to
> objfile->flags before we get here, no?
Hm, I think so, yes. I mean, assuming that objfile != NULL when we call
the readers, then yes; we always call symbol_file_add_with_addrs which
is responsible for propagating the flag.
> So references to the global readnever_symbol_files can (and should)
> be removed from the readers, right? This removes the need for
> the new '#include "top.h"'s too, so please remove those from
> the patch along the way.
OK, done.
>>
>> if (info->stabsects)
>> {
>> diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
>> index 4f552225aa..a3127dd637 100644
>> --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
>> +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
>> @@ -1037,6 +1037,15 @@ Read each symbol file's entire symbol table immediately, rather than
>> the default, which is to read it incrementally as it is needed.
>> This makes startup slower, but makes future operations faster.
>>
>> +@item --readnever
>> +@cindex @code{--readnever}, command-line option
>> +Do not read each symbol file's symbolic debug information. This makes
>> +startup faster but at the expense of not being able to perform
>> +symbolic debugging. DWARF unwind information is also not read,
>> +meaning backtraces may become incomplete or inaccurate. One use of
>> +this is when a user simply wants to do the following sequence: attach,
>> +dump core, detach. Loading the debugging information in this case is
>> +an unnecessary cause of delay.
>> @end table
>>
>> @node Mode Options
>> @@ -18576,6 +18585,14 @@ tables by using the @samp{-readnow} option with any of the commands that
>> load symbol table information, if you want to be sure @value{GDBN} has the
>> entire symbol table available.
>>
>> +@cindex @code{-readnever}, option for symbol-file command
>> +@cindex never read symbols
>> +@cindex symbols, never read
>> +@item symbol-file @r{[} -readnever @r{]} @var{filename}
>> +@itemx file @r{[} -readnever @r{]} @var{filename}
>> +You can instruct @value{GDBN} to never read the symbolic information
>> +contained in @var{filename} by using the @samp{-readnever} option.
>
> Maybe copy the rationale for this found in "--readnever" here
> or xref the "--readnever" command line option?
I used an xref.
>
>> #define READNOW_HELP \
>> "The '-readnow' option will cause GDB to read the entire symbol file\n\
>> immediately. This makes the command slower, but may make future operations\n\
>> -faster."
>> +faster.\n"
>> +
>> +#define READNEVER_HELP \
>> + "The '-readnever' option will prevent GDB from reading the symbol file's\n\
>> +symbolic debug information."
>>
>
> Why not merge these two macros in one? We'll always want to
> use them together, in the same order? You could rename the
> macro to READNOW_READNEVER_HELP for example.
Did it.
I'll wait until we sort out the patch to extend the argument parser of
'{add-,}symbol-file' before I submit v5.
Thanks,
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 20:54 [RFC/RFA] Add support for the --readnever command-line option (DWARF only) Joel Brobecker
2016-07-12 14:27 ` Yao Qi
2016-10-04 18:07 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-23 0:54 ` [PATCH v2] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-23 12:09 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-23 17:21 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-23 17:29 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-24 4:54 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-24 13:18 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-24 20:27 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-27 19:13 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 0:59 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 12:23 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-23 15:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-23 19:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-10-04 18:06 ` [RFC/RFA] " Pedro Alves
2017-11-24 23:01 ` [PATCH v2] Add support for the --readnever command-line option Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-25 7:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-25 16:41 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-25 17:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-29 1:21 ` [PATCH v3] Add support for the readnever concept Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 3:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-29 12:25 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 18:43 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 21:45 ` [PATCH] Make 'symbol-file' not care about the position of command line arguments Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 22:26 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 22:42 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 23:15 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 0:08 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 0:34 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 4:07 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 4:25 ` [PATCH v2] Make '{add-,}symbol-file' " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 10:57 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 12:38 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 12:49 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 13:06 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 13:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 15:01 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 17:26 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 17:37 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 17:43 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 17:50 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 20:00 ` [PATCH v4] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 12:11 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 17:41 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 21:45 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 22:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 0:25 ` [PATCH v4] Add support for the readnever concept Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 11:53 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 4:35 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2017-12-01 12:43 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 17:19 ` Tom Tromey
2017-12-01 17:21 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 20:00 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 22:16 ` [PATCH v5] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 23:19 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-02 2:31 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-02 8:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87shcvgj55.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).