From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21655 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2014 07:11:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21640 invoked by uid 89); 25 Sep 2014 07:11:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.110) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:11:13 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:11:10 +0100 Received: from d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.14) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:11:07 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6278F2190041 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:10:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.252]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s8P7B5bl42795092 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:11:05 GMT Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s8P7B4xV016527 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 01:11:05 -0600 Received: from br87z6lw.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-196.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.196]) by d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s8P7B3tG016476; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 01:11:03 -0600 From: Andreas Arnez To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: palves@redhat.com (Pedro Alves), jan.kratochvil@redhat.com (Jan Kratochvil), xdje42@gmail.com (Doug Evans), gdb-patches@sourceware.org (gdb-patches\@sourceware.org) Subject: Re: automated testing comment [Re: time to workaround libc/13097 in fsf gdb?] References: <201409241523.s8OFNNjP009931@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201409241523.s8OFNNjP009931@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:23:23 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <87sijgjhtk.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14092507-1948-0000-0000-0000013BB30D X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00722.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 24 2014, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Andreas Arnez wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 23 2014, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >> > I think it'd be fine to send the periodic email results/alerts/whatever to: >> > >> > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testresults/ >> > >> > That list hasn't been active in a while, but it's still alive, afaics, >> > and the point of that list was to collect auto testers' test results. >> >> Interesting. Even before I started working on GDB, Andreas Krebbel had >> set up a bot that sends test results to a different list, and we're >> still continuing to do so: >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/ >> >> Knowing now that there's also gdb-testresults, I wonder whether that >> ever was a good choice. We could certainly change that, so gdb-testers >> is freed up for discussions like this one ;-) > > Well, I guess that would be because the main web page: > https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/mailing-lists/ > says: > > gdb-testers > is a list for the announcement of development snapshots and the reporting of test results. > > and does not mention gdb-testresults at all. Right, I also noticed that gdb-testers is mirrored by Gmane (as comp.gdb.testing) and gdb-testresults is not. I'm puzzled why gdb-testresults was ever created... > I think we should agree on one of them, and document it on the web page. For instance by leaving everything as-is? Or maybe, for clarity, we should at least drop the obsolete "announcement of development snapshots" from the list description?