Re: [PATCH 0/2] Missing thread events for remote targets

[Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>]

Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> writes:

> I noticed that in some situations we are missing thread events ('new
> thead' and 'thread exited') when using a remote target.  The second
> patch in this series addresses this issue.
>
> While writing the test for this case I discovered that
> $_inferior_thread_count doesn't always give the correct value when
> using remote targets, so the first patch addresses this issue.

I've gone ahead and pushed this series.

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> ---
>
> Andrew Burgess (2):
>   gdb: call update_thread_list for $_inferior_thread_count function
>   gdb: call update_thread_list after completing an inferior call
>
>  gdb/infcall.c                                 |   7 +
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.c     |  80 ++++++++
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.exp   | 175 ++++++++++++++++
>  .../gdb.threads/infcall-thread-announce.c     | 192 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../gdb.threads/infcall-thread-announce.exp   |  71 +++++++
>  gdb/thread.c                                  |   2 +
>  6 files changed, 527 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.c
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/inf-thr-count.exp
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/infcall-thread-announce.c
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/infcall-thread-announce.exp
>
>
> base-commit: f6ca448ab70c52e923b7010aecdf7be9c0d4d4fc
> -- 
> 2.25.4