From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block, part 1
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 15:24:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8aeucq5.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231104155757.16649-2-tdevries@suse.de>
Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
> When running test-case gdb.base/vfork-follow-parent.exp on powerpc64 (likewise
> on s390x), I run into:
> ...
> (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/vfork-follow-parent.exp: \
> exec_file=vfork-follow-parent-exit: target-non-stop=on: non-stop=off: \
> resolution_method=schedule-multiple: print unblock_parent = 1
> continue^M
> Continuing.^M
> Reading symbols from vfork-follow-parent-exit...^M
> ^M
> ^M
> Fatal signal: Segmentation fault^M
> ----- Backtrace -----^M
> 0x1027d3e7 gdb_internal_backtrace_1^M
> src/gdb/bt-utils.c:122^M
> 0x1027d54f _Z22gdb_internal_backtracev^M
> src/gdb/bt-utils.c:168^M
> 0x1057643f handle_fatal_signal^M
> src/gdb/event-top.c:889^M
> 0x10576677 handle_sigsegv^M
> src/gdb/event-top.c:962^M
> 0x3fffa7610477 ???^M
> 0x103f2144 for_each_block^M
> src/gdb/dcache.c:199^M
> 0x103f235b _Z17dcache_invalidateP13dcache_struct^M
> src/gdb/dcache.c:251^M
> 0x10bde8c7 _Z24target_dcache_invalidatev^M
> src/gdb/target-dcache.c:50^M
> ...
> or similar.
>
> The root cause for the segmentation fault is that linux_is_uclinux gives an
> incorrect result: it should always return false, given that we're running on a
> regular linux system, but instead it returns first true, then false.
>
> In more detail, the segmentation fault happens as follows:
> - a program space with an address space is created
> - a second program space is about to be created. maybe_new_address_space
> is called, and because linux_is_uclinux returns true, maybe_new_address_space
> returns false, and no new address space is created
> - a second program space with the same address space is created
> - a program space is deleted. Because linux_is_uclinux now returns false,
> gdbarch_has_shared_address_space (current_inferior ()->arch ()) returns
> false, and the address space is deleted
> - when gdb uses the address space of the remaining program space, we run into
> the segfault, because the address space is deleted.
>
> Hardcoding linux_is_uclinux to false makes the test-case pass.
>
> We leave addressing the root cause for the following commit in this series.
>
> For now, prevent the segmentation fault by making the address space a refcounted
> object.
>
> This was already suggested here [1]:
> ...
> A better solution might be to have the address spaces be reference counted
> ...
>
> Tested on top of trunk on x86_64-linux and ppc64le-linux.
> Tested on top of gdb-14-branch on ppc64-linux.
>
> PR gdb/30547
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30547
>
> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-October/202928.html
> ---
> gdb/progspace.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> gdb/progspace.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/progspace.c b/gdb/progspace.c
> index 839707e9d71..4fea21f0ca1 100644
> --- a/gdb/progspace.c
> +++ b/gdb/progspace.c
> @@ -96,9 +96,9 @@ remove_program_space (program_space *pspace)
> /* See progspace.h. */
>
> program_space::program_space (address_space *aspace_)
> - : num (++last_program_space_num),
> - aspace (aspace_)
> + : num (++last_program_space_num)
> {
> + set_aspace (aspace_);
> program_spaces.push_back (this);
> gdb::observers::new_program_space.notify (this);
> }
> @@ -122,8 +122,7 @@ program_space::~program_space ()
> /* Defer breakpoint re-set because we don't want to create new
> locations for this pspace which we're tearing down. */
> clear_symtab_users (SYMFILE_DEFER_BP_RESET);
> - if (!gdbarch_has_shared_address_space (current_inferior ()->arch ()))
> - delete this->aspace;
> + reset_aspace ();
> }
>
> /* See progspace.h. */
> @@ -409,20 +408,19 @@ update_address_spaces (void)
>
> init_address_spaces ();
>
> + for (struct program_space *pspace : program_spaces)
> + pspace->reset_aspace ();
> +
> if (shared_aspace)
> {
> struct address_space *aspace = new address_space ();
>
> - delete current_program_space->aspace;
> for (struct program_space *pspace : program_spaces)
> - pspace->aspace = aspace;
> + pspace->set_aspace (aspace);
> }
> else
> for (struct program_space *pspace : program_spaces)
> - {
> - delete pspace->aspace;
> - pspace->aspace = new address_space ();
> - }
> + pspace->set_aspace (new address_space ());
>
> for (inferior *inf : all_inferiors ())
> if (gdbarch_has_global_solist (current_inferior ()->arch ()))
> @@ -433,8 +431,27 @@ update_address_spaces (void)
>
> \f
>
> +void
> +program_space::set_aspace (struct address_space *aspace_)
> +{
> + aspace = aspace_;
> +
> + aspace->incref ();
> +}
> +
> /* See progspace.h. */
>
> +void
> +program_space::reset_aspace ()
> +{
> + aspace->decref ();
> +
> + if (aspace->refcount () == 0)
> + delete aspace;
> +
> + aspace = nullptr;
> +}
I wouldn't have expected the reference counting to be done manually like
this. I would have expected either:
* Use a std::shared_ptr<address_space> within program_space, and then
either also hold a std::shared_ptr within the inferior too, or
potentially loan out raw pointers (to the inferior) using
std::shared_ptr::get, or
* Create a new type using gdb::ref_ptr ... but thinking about it,
given the reference counting policy on this would be pretty vanilla,
if you had done this, I think I'd be asking why not just use
std::shared_ptr.
> +
> void
> program_space::clear_solib_cache ()
> {
> diff --git a/gdb/progspace.h b/gdb/progspace.h
> index a22e427400e..065ca38e255 100644
> --- a/gdb/progspace.h
> +++ b/gdb/progspace.h
> @@ -336,6 +336,10 @@ struct program_space
> make breakpoints global). */
> struct address_space *aspace = NULL;
>
> + void set_aspace (struct address_space *aspace);
> +
> + void reset_aspace ();
These should have explanatory comments. It feels like at a minimum
aspace should be made private, though I really think its type should be
changed to something that manages the reference counting for us.
Thanks,
Andrew
> +
> /* True if this program space's section offsets don't yet represent
> the final offsets of the "live" address space (that is, the
> section addresses still require the relocation offsets to be
> @@ -384,12 +388,17 @@ struct program_space
> /* An address space. It is used for comparing if
> pspaces/inferior/threads see the same address space and for
> associating caches to each address space. */
> -struct address_space
> +struct address_space : public refcounted_object
> {
> /* Create a new address space object, and add it to the list. */
> address_space ();
> DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN (address_space);
>
> + ~address_space ()
> + {
> + gdb_assert (refcount () == 0);
> + }
> +
> /* Returns the integer address space id of this address space. */
> int num () const
> {
> --
> 2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-04 15:57 [PATCH 0/2] [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block Tom de Vries
2023-11-04 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block, part 1 Tom de Vries
2023-11-06 15:24 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2023-11-07 13:28 ` Tom de Vries
2023-11-06 17:05 ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-07 11:16 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-11-07 13:32 ` Tom de Vries
2023-11-04 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block, part 2 Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v8aeucq5.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).