From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21970 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2014 14:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21955 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2014 14:33:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:33:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0DEXSsb018699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:29 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0DEXQgU010515 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:28 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] remove overlapping allocation macros References: <1389029524-19907-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1389029524-19907-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:32:01 -0700") Message-ID: <87vbxo2bpl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> Right now, gdb defines some allocation macros in defs.h, specifically Tom> XZALLOC, XMALLOC, and XCALLOC. libiberty also defines similar Tom> allocation macros, and gdb uses both variants. Tom> I think it's somewhat nicer if gdb uses just a single set of wrapper Tom> macros, and so this patch series replaces all the uses of the gdb Tom> macros with the corresponding macros from libiberty. I'm checking this in now. Tom