From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from progateway7-pub.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.38.55]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A2E3858D32 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:45:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 47A2E3858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from cmgw15.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.130]) by progateway7.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21CD10042388 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id U9ijqkHAzMOiZU9ijqCnSO; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:45:13 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=TaZTCTch c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=64d52229 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=OWjo9vPv0XrRhIrVQ50Ab3nP57M=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=UttIx32zK-AA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=wS45gUUZOOecb6awm9kA:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iJ5owFxlXE6AtkVx7fSfVeavpgXds/UsWt1c+sc9y2g=; b=TAQR1O0Y2jsBFxeJtBTN6EYtR5 pirBxzrsPCw9bbxfVD0L+uzDTZPqRV9n2qBjyAVV/Fg5CEXIxgRaJNJqTBGbJYUel3bYeP2ACXndL 7a63MZIpzV3XRvpk+8RRQeCy6; Received: from 71-211-152-221.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.211.152.221]:59536 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qU9ij-001nsB-1F; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:45:13 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: "Ijaz, Abdul B via Gdb-patches" Cc: Tom Tromey , "Ijaz, Abdul B" , "JiniSusan.George@amd.com" , "eliz@gnu.org" , "blarsen@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] gdb: Skip trampoline frames in the stack for printing or finish command. References: <20230801224744.24433-1-abdul.b.ijaz@intel.com> <20230801224744.24433-5-abdul.b.ijaz@intel.com> <87h6phch31.fsf@tromey.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:45:12 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Abdul B. via Gdb-patches Ijaz's message of "Mon, 7 Aug 2023 13:28:55 +0000") Message-ID: <87wmy223mf.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 71.211.152.221 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1qU9ij-001nsB-1F X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 71-211-152-221.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [71.211.152.221]:59536 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 6 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3018.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Tom> If I am stopped in a frame and go "up", will I be in the trampoline Tom> frame anyway? And will "bt" then not print the selected frame? Tom> But "frame" will? > Yes in current implementation bt will not print those trampoline > frames and user may see from the frame number in bt since in output > frame numbers will be missing/elided for those trampoline calls. So > "up" command will still take it to trampoline call. Do we need to > handle "up" call ? I don't think so. It's not handled for other elision cases. Tom