From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14C13856DC0 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:13:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C14C13856DC0 Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id l127so2667433iof.12 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:13:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=b6MkW5ilBzhWFnrzf9iqmK09aVVDGvsMCsmqc8YtNhg=; b=KWIDEf5PkKXK6Bd1FBPyvWnQhdoxBCiqKonXNMqpUsUzQaKy/SLX4v2Zc3+gVLi4Xu OFDLY8ENPcyuNDKcW9RAvppEjPOHQilFcaw9MWCA+i9Lf6ixoB2WtKxbpmBgfc7Y6Tmx hZ/0MY3jpDtD63ZAarTkm5b6fX1W/C5+64gtVRLONpIhDXfo4CRAkpsrKQYw9dNOV2f2 OKFnF788/GX3r7g3iLPh6Tj9p7p1wYxJDP7jXqLDg4VkTDvRYeDjD/HMhit10Ux5IpVi CEyJ6FB5pvgLlhazM+OIdqoGwOLF+SA53A6TbKYT8T3a+1IU+MR361x89kh0VNaDuF3U Jvkg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2HM8JBzWToUYyagCU5tberI1rUX0lZIpVbpwzuhKXGPORjovmK WJnsRYiHC7BTUzsVMpmGvTc3Xw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5sieKP9bLovlkE5z1zduwCPmowJA41XPEa8KMrVMqTuyz8z98KNaAuVh1Y1YZj++m1uLRjIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5e:c902:0:b0:6bc:22b7:200a with SMTP id z2-20020a5ec902000000b006bc22b7200amr13609807iol.126.1666368788881; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from murgatroyd (97-122-76-186.hlrn.qwest.net. [97.122.76.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l20-20020a927014000000b002dcfbf36438sm4161837ilc.12.2022.10.21.09.13.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:13:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches Cc: Tom Tromey , Tom de Vries Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect .gdb_index with new DWARF scanner References: <20221017194118.2129436-1-tromey@adacore.com> <47302e23-30af-d8ca-b1fb-28977110a72a@suse.de> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:13:07 -0600 In-Reply-To: <47302e23-30af-d8ca-b1fb-28977110a72a@suse.de> (Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:41:53 +0200") Message-ID: <87wn8tb1f0.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:13:13 -0000 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches writes: >> PR symtab/29694 points out a regression caused by the new DWARF >> scanner when the cc-with-gdb-index target board is used. [...] Tom> Regression tested on openSUSE Tumbleweed x86_64 with native and Tom> cc-with-gdb-index board, results looks good. Tom> Patch LGTM. Thank you. I'm going to check it in. There's still one open regression for the new DWARF reader. I haven't fully investigated it yet. (There's also the TSan bug(s), but on my machine TSan reports a lot of obviously untrue things, like captured_main being called from a signal handler. So I haven't really looked at this at all.) Tom