From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11746 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2015 14:08:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11732 invoked by uid 89); 7 Jan 2015 14:08:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:08:44 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Y8rHs-0000wy-W4 from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 06:08:41 -0800 Received: from GreenOnly (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 06:08:40 -0800 From: Yao Qi To: Pedro Alves CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] linux-nat.c: better starvation avoidance, handle non-stop mode too References: <1419625871-28848-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1419625871-28848-7-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <8761cjul2b.fsf@codesourcery.com> <54AD330E.5020007@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <54AD330E.5020007@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 7 Jan 2015 13:22:22 +0000") Message-ID: <87wq4yu1i0.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves writes: > That is, the LWP had previously stopped for a breakpoint, and we > left that event pending. But if the breakpoint is now gone, > GDB core isn't interested in it anymore, so we just discard > that event. The breakpoint is gone because it is removed by user, for example, it that correct? > Here's the updated patch. It looks good to me. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)