public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't enable gdbtk in testsuite
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 06:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4qmd1qu.fsf@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548094B1.8050708@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 4	Dec 2014 17:06:57 +0000")

Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

> That patch removed it from the git repo, mirroring how CVS modules
> worked.  In CVS, if you checkout the "gdb" module, you don't get
> the gdbtk dirs, but if you checkout the insight module instead, you
> get everything gdb, plus the insight bits: src/gdb/gdbtk subdir,
> src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.gdbtk/, and maybe other bits.

Hi Pedro,
I looked at insight and the date of the last commit in
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog is 2013-10-21.  Looks insight stops updating gdb
after gdb migrates to git so I think it should be safe to remove
testsuite gdbtk from gdb head.

>
> So removing the testsuite support for gdbtk doesn't seem like
> the right thing to do.  Particularly since we still have the
> gdbtk bits in gdb/configure.ac.  IOW, I don't see how
> src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.gdbtk/ not being around is different
> from src/gdb/gdbtk/ not being around.  We should either keep
> all support for gdbtk, or remove all of it.

It is aggressive to remove gdbtk bits from gdb/configure.ac, although
there were some "insight end-of-life" discussions on insight mail list.
I am OK to revert my patch.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-05  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-25  8:11 Yao Qi
2014-11-30 15:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-01  6:15   ` Yao Qi
2014-12-04 17:07 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-05  6:55   ` Yao Qi [this message]
2014-12-05  9:54     ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-05 10:05       ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-05 12:04       ` Yao Qi
2014-12-05 11:27 Roland Schwingel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y4qmd1qu.fsf@codesourcery.com \
    --to=yao@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).