From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13849 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2013 21:21:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13837 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2013 21:21:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:21:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAELLJmk031877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:21:19 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-124.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.124]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rAELLIho002870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:21:19 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] New "make check-headers" rule. References: <1384151855-12926-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <5283CD04.3080501@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5283CD04.3080501@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2013 19:03:32 +0000") Message-ID: <87y54qvfw1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> New "make check-headers" rule. It seems like a good idea to me. Pedro> +check-headers: Pedro> + @echo Checking headers. Pedro> + for i in $(CHECK_HEADERS) ; do \ Pedro> + $(NODEPS_COMPILE) -Wno-error $(PYTHON_CFLAGS) -include defs.h \ Pedro> + $(srcdir)/$$i -o /dev/null ; \ Pedro> + done I'm curious why -Wno-error. Also why not -fsyntax-only? ... neither of which I think are blockers. It's fine to refine this later. Tom