public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PR gdb/23210] Unset gdbarch significant_addr_bit by default
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 18:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zi0n1sti.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1527023088-10837-1-git-send-email-omair.javaid@linaro.org>	(Omair Javaid's message of "Wed, 23 May 2018 02:04:48 +0500")

On Tuesday, May 22 2018, Omair Javaid wrote:

> This patch fixes a bug introduced by fix to AArch64 pointer tagging.
>
> In our fix for tagged pointer support our agreed approach was to sign
> extend user-space address after clearing tag bits. This is not same
> for all architectures and this patch allows sign extension for
> addresses on targets which specifically set significant_addr_bit.
>
> More information about patch that caused the issues and discussion
> around tagged pointer support can be found in links below:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-05/msg00000.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-12/msg00159.html

FWIW, I've tested your patch locally and it fixes the timeout issues
I've been seeing when debugging 32-bit binaries with a 64-bit GDB.
Thanks.

> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-05-23  Omair Javaid  <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
>
> 	* gdbarch.c (verify_gdbarch): Update.
> 	* utils.c (address_significant): Update.
> ---
>  gdb/gdbarch.c | 3 +--
>  gdb/utils.c   | 5 +++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.c b/gdb/gdbarch.c
> index c430ebe..5593911 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbarch.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbarch.c
> @@ -615,8 +615,7 @@ verify_gdbarch (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
>    /* Skip verify of stabs_argument_has_addr, invalid_p == 0 */
>    /* Skip verify of convert_from_func_ptr_addr, invalid_p == 0 */
>    /* Skip verify of addr_bits_remove, invalid_p == 0 */
> -  if (gdbarch->significant_addr_bit == 0)
> -    gdbarch->significant_addr_bit = gdbarch_addr_bit (gdbarch);
> +  /* Skip verify of significant_addr_bit, invalid_p == 0 */
>    /* Skip verify of software_single_step, has predicate.  */
>    /* Skip verify of single_step_through_delay, has predicate.  */
>    /* Skip verify of print_insn, invalid_p == 0 */
> diff --git a/gdb/utils.c b/gdb/utils.c
> index 9c5bf68..91c0f2b 100644
> --- a/gdb/utils.c
> +++ b/gdb/utils.c
> @@ -2708,10 +2708,11 @@ address_significant (gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR addr)
>    /* Clear insignificant bits of a target address and sign extend resulting
>       address, avoiding shifts larger or equal than the width of a CORE_ADDR.
>       The local variable ADDR_BIT stops the compiler reporting a shift overflow
> -     when it won't occur.  */
> +     when it won't occur. Skip updating of target address if current target has
> +     not set gdbarch significant_addr_bit.  */
>    int addr_bit = gdbarch_significant_addr_bit (gdbarch);
>  
> -  if (addr_bit < (sizeof (CORE_ADDR) * HOST_CHAR_BIT))
> +  if (addr_bit && (addr_bit < (sizeof (CORE_ADDR) * HOST_CHAR_BIT)))
>      {
>        CORE_ADDR sign = (CORE_ADDR) 1 << (addr_bit - 1);
>        addr &= ((CORE_ADDR) 1 << addr_bit) - 1;
> -- 
> 2.7.4

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-25 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-22 21:43 Omair Javaid
2018-05-23 11:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-05-25 17:29   ` Omair Javaid
2018-05-25 18:02     ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-25 18:44 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zi0n1sti.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=omair.javaid@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).