public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdb: testsuite: remove pass statement in can_spawn_for_attach
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:15:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bf63d2d-f1b3-9699-fed4-2757986050ba@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e74029d3-1dc3-df9a-133a-40559472eb68@polymtl.ca>



On 03/16/2022 09:21 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> Hi Tiezhu,
>
> Did you consider changing the approach to what Pedro suggested here?
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/186311.html
>
> I have to admit that I approved your patch because I didn't really have
> a better suggestion, and I know that it's a real problem (which I
> encounter myself sometimes).  But Pedro's suggestion seems more
> straightforward.

OK, thank you, I will send patches later.

Thanks,
Tiezhu

>
> Simon
>
> On 2022-03-04 05:15, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>> After execute the following command:
>>
>>   make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp"
>>
>> we can see the following messages in gdb/testsuite/gdb.log:
>>
>>   (gdb) gdb_do_cache_wrap ignoring pass: can spawn for attach
>>
>> the pass statement is ignored, just remove them in can_spawn_for_attach.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
>> ---
>>  gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 2 --
>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>> index a35d08a..f21b22c 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>> @@ -5111,7 +5111,6 @@ gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach {
>>      file delete $obj
>>      gdb_test_multiple "attach $test_pid" "can spawn for attach" {
>>          -re -wrap "Attaching to process $test_pid\r\n.*No executable file now.*" {
>> -          pass $gdb_test_name
>>            kill_wait_spawned_process $test_spawn_id
>>            return 1
>>          }
>> @@ -5126,7 +5125,6 @@ gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach {
>>            return 0
>>          }
>>          -re -wrap "Attaching to process $test_pid\r\n.*XML support was disabled at compile time.*" {
>> -          pass $gdb_test_name
>>            kill_wait_spawned_process $test_spawn_id
>>            return 1
>>          }


      reply	other threads:[~2022-03-16  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-04 10:15 Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-04 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] gdb: testsuite: fix failed testcases in gdb.base/jit-elf.exp Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-14 13:08   ` [PING] " Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-14 13:07 ` [PING] [PATCH 1/2] gdb: testsuite: remove pass statement in can_spawn_for_attach Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-16  1:21 ` Simon Marchi
2022-03-16  6:15   ` Tiezhu Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8bf63d2d-f1b3-9699-fed4-2757986050ba@loongson.cn \
    --to=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).