public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/x86: use size of XSAVE area of enabled features
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:11:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bf88a29-33bc-408e-b8f7-f1db7ab5f452@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e287e21-57a8-11a6-8cdf-60cb34510129@FreeBSD.org>

On 9/27/23 16:20, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 9/27/23 5:15 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> Since commit b42405a1594 ("gdb: Update x86 Linux architectures to
>> support XSAVE layouts."), the test gdb.base/gcore.exp fails on my AMD
>> Ryzen 3700X machine:
>>
>>      FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored all registers
>>
>> The test gets the register state (saves the output of "info
>> all-registers"), saves a core with the "gcore" command, loads the core,
>> and checks the register state against the one previously saved.  The
>> problem is that when reading registers from the core file, the last half
>> of ymm registers is unavailable:
>>
>>      (gdb) print $ymm0.v32_int8
>>      $1 = {0, -77, -23, -9, -1, 127, 0, 0, 0, -77, -23, -9, -1, 127, 0, 0, <unavailable> <repeats 16 times>}
>>
>> One strange thing with this machine is that the bitset of state
>> components supported by XCR0 is 0x207, meaning "x87 | SSE | AVX | PKRU",
>> but XCR0 at runtime is 0x7, meaning "x87 | SSE | AVX".  So, PKRU appears
>> to be supported by the processor, but disabled by the kernel.  I didn't
>> find why yet.
>>
>>  From CPUID leaf EAX=0Dh, ECX=00h, GDB can get:
>>
>>   - from EBX: max size of the XSAVE area required by features currently
>>     enabled in XCR0.  On my machine, it's 0x340 (832).
>>   - from ECX: max size of the XSAVE area required by all features
>>     supported by XCR0.  On my machine, it's 0x380 (896).
>>
>> At runtime, GDB uses ECX (max size required by all supported features)
>> to fill the x86_xsave_layout::sizeof_xsave.  So, when writing the core
>> file note for the XSAVE state, it writes a note of size 896, even though
>> it doesn't write the PKRU state.  When loading back the core, GDB tries
>> to figure out the layout of the XSAVE area based on what features are
>> enabled in XCR0 and the size of the note (the size of the XSAVE area).
>> Since my combination of XCR0 and size of XSAVE area doesn't match any
>> combination known by GDB, GDB falls back to a gdbarch supporting only
>> x87 and SSE.
>>
>> This patch changes GDB to populate the x86_xsave_layout::sizeof_xsave
>> field (and consequently the size of the XSAVE state note in core files)
>> using EBX, the size of the XSAVE area required by currently enabled
>> features in XCR0.  This makes i387_guess_xsave_layout recognize my case
>> with this condition:
>>
>>    else if (HAS_AVX (xcr0) && xsave_size == 832)
>>      {
>>        /* Intel and AMD CPUs supporting AVX.  */
>>        layout.avx_offset = 576;
>>      }
>>
>> In other words, just as if my machine didn't support PKRU at all.
>>
>> Another reason why I think this change makes sense is that XSAVE state
>> notes in kernel-generated cores on this machine have size 832.  So this
>> change makes GDB-generated cores more similar to kernel-generated ones,
>> reducing the diversity of XSAVE state notes that GDB needs to be able to
>> figure out.
>>
>> Note that if PKRU was enabled on my machine, then the effective XSAVE
>> area size would be 896 bytes.  We would need to add a case in
>> i387_guess_xsave_layout for that combination, since there is no
>> currently.  But I don't have a way to test that right now, since I don't
>> know why PKRU is disabled.
>>
>> Change-Id: If64f30307f3a2e5ca3e1fd1cb7379ea840805a85
>> ---
>>   gdb/nat/x86-xstate.c | 6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/nat/x86-xstate.c b/gdb/nat/x86-xstate.c
>> index 9fdc572356ab..5ae014af4f49 100644
>> --- a/gdb/nat/x86-xstate.c
>> +++ b/gdb/nat/x86-xstate.c
>> @@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ xsave_feature_offset (uint64_t xcr0, int feature)
>>   int
>>   x86_xsave_length ()
>>   {
>> -  uint32_t ecx;
>> +  uint32_t ebx;
>>   -  if (!x86_cpuid_count (0xd, 0, nullptr, nullptr, &ecx, nullptr))
>> +  if (!x86_cpuid_count (0xd, 0, nullptr, &ebx, nullptr, nullptr))
>>       return 0;
>> -  return ecx;
>> +  return ebx;
>>   }
>>     /* See x86-xstate.h.  */
>>
>> base-commit: 4befded43f524d0840bb88fff7b77415b73a3851
> 
> Reviewed-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
> 
> One further note is that the Linux x86 arches use x86_xsave_length() to infer
> ("guess") the size of the XSAVE register set that the Linux kernel writes out
> in core dumps.  On FreeBSD x86 arches, GDB is able to query this size directly
> from the kernel via ptrace.  My use of ECX for this guess earlier was just not
> the best guess.  In the case that the kernel enables all of the available
> features, then ECX and EBX have the same values, so this only matters for a
> system where the kernel has enabled a subset of available XSAVE extensions.

Thanks, will push.  I'll copy paste that note in the commit message for
posterity, it might help people (including me) in the future.

Simon

      reply	other threads:[~2023-09-28 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-27 16:15 Simon Marchi
2023-09-27 20:20 ` John Baldwin
2023-09-28 14:11   ` Simon Marchi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8bf88a29-33bc-408e-b8f7-f1db7ab5f452@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jhb@FreeBSD.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).