From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7F6385C306 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:01:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4A7F6385C306 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 4A7F6385C306 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701799312; cv=none; b=hxiDrNv4yCQZ3fijSjDWBPt6yPsbTr3xtOfeU6FkBDpb6t9Lifh+D9rWs4UvUJqS+2jS/uIsMIPRIZrWd8jywuLmGnJ+RdPK5TsZ68ydh/3q5Bexh5DIfC9YJxQ6WpzHAVOgwKtRCegSD60zSDKKAuMTKfS8Qox/Nhz2aKV2ZjU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701799312; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zaNyvB0VbVkCRz/xOPxO14w7yIVxWedlIG9VLFG2kAU=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:Mime-Version; b=SfnBO0qmZDFa8rnWBTCtHkhyYPUuwrgdN4bzv4cE8J0X6vZ78EO0cGnAk2D5CSgRPsIQsaglM619Atbtn0Hr2Bqepr+HiDndKVrUH8XOI8UvW0i0sLdlMMWuNDGu0PKvHQimjSGeMlT/xzAbsPHLFKpZix2/LWKPt9rymWcVats= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from pps.filterd (m0353722.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3B5HIYqQ024990; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:01:49 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=w7xd7u9xQFbK4tcehWWi2QNvV3ZUrSxd0mFAgw8ar7A=; b=SVE7TlWeLHghC0UdWe/F0IiMhZ/jocCV+TeoyhCYLQGGW4HzaLgHrANDLECi/5zEkfL/ y4Zky/6cVNzRJZPmCt0nzOKBOSDyYIUhW6ZuYWNW8Le4r7TzIDHw5DUfNb7DYxgEMb4T jHRrEqBvrl7P3hdLRmFqPJX9Ty8oKcdMhsAoXKrAMGg9ddR5+LkMf0l1KPHkzj/P4IyM eAXaaKRIU0IhdKALKHJ/peSZ3nCj+v8gYMGNyJxq+82Gvi1t972DtZTg4IWdfLowAPY9 jsE0YCeIxapXImEaB8Yu0AOezbRbwGb/BCAu6GHwkYly+QHmkK9Ql1mhTQim2HiRkjyu TQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ut8519862-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Dec 2023 18:01:48 +0000 Received: from m0353722.ppops.net (m0353722.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 3B5HmMOn027382; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:01:48 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ut851985q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Dec 2023 18:01:48 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3B5GhmZX009147; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:01:47 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.7]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3urgdm08fn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Dec 2023 18:01:47 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.100]) by smtprelay05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 3B5I1lmP25821750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:01:47 GMT Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0154E5805D; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:01:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF4C58058; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:01:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wecm-9-67-78-200.wecm.ibm.com (unknown [9.67.78.200]) by smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:01:46 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <8e771024d7ebbe9f36336a80312ea330f05e8a28.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp FAIL From: Carl Love To: luis.machado@arm.com, blarsen@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: cel@linux.ibm.com Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 10:01:45 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-22.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: VEVvoBM6oFpa79G4cB1Q-1uSPY6ekHLc X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: XqVHH6bjyME99qCnl6el9tfHg9iiKyv4 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-12-05_13,2023-12-05_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=671 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311060000 definitions=main-2312050142 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Luis, Guinevere: I am also seeing a recent increase in the attach-many-short-lived- threads.exp test failures on both Power 9 and 10 buildbot results. I have seen a little "noise" in the past with a threads or signal test occasionally failing and then being fine on the next run. I don't remember this particular test being noisy in the past. But this test seems to have recently gotten really "noisy". I saw that you both briefly discussed the failures on IRC. Here is what I am seeing for the attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp test failures. The issues started on Friday Nov 31. Power 9 Power 10 11/31/2023 39 new fail, 1 fixed 0 new, 0 fixed 12/1/2023 0 new, 39 fixed 50 new, 0 fixed 12/2/2023 52 new, 0 fixed 87 new, 40 fixed 12/3/2023 checkout fail 12 new, 6 fixed I ran the full regression tests manually today. It the attach-many- short-lived-threads.exp test ran fine on Power 9 and failed 103 times on Power 10. I took a quick look at the git log and nothing jumped out as an obvious culprit. It sounded like Luis was going to look into the test. I thought I would start by reaching out to see what the status is? Do we have a bugzilla for the issue? Carl