From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED3FA3858C2C for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:18:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org ED3FA3858C2C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-180-24.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.180.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 343681F0BB; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:18:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <8ecf9cc1-452a-b9f9-d53a-f35af1a0dc29@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:18:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] [gdb/testsuite] test a function call by hand from pretty printer Content-Language: tl To: Bruno Larsen , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20220223185729.25609-1-blarsen@redhat.com> <20220314203926.58662-1-blarsen@redhat.com> <1a80930b-0bf3-9147-2065-e1bf474990d0@simark.ca> <853f9e05-c815-d04c-371c-0fb1f31df2f2@redhat.com> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <853f9e05-c815-d04c-371c-0fb1f31df2f2@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3639.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:18:59 -0000 > Oh sorry, I didn't think about that. My thinking was that this looked > like a pretty complex issue, so I could at least get some sort > conversation going in case anyone knew how to fix the problem, and > could help me find the origin of the problems. It doesn't test > anything new that doesn't fail, but unfortunately, I had already > pushed the change when your email arrived. If you want to remove it > until I have a fix, I understand it. Sorry again. Ok, I'll remove the test and attach it to the bug. This will help bring back my little CI closer to being green. Simon