From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12735 invoked by alias); 10 May 2018 19:26:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12722 invoked by uid 89); 10 May 2018 19:26:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:41f3, yours X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 May 2018 19:26:19 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44259883D6; Thu, 10 May 2018 19:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theo.uglyboxes.com (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF19F5DD7C; Thu, 10 May 2018 19:26:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFA] inadvertent language switch during breakpoint_re_set_one To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1525976353-67414-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20180510190813.2ymdp3xjmewxz7ku@adacore.com> From: Keith Seitz Message-ID: <96b85384-a057-41f3-907f-007d19f22e51@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 19:35:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180510190813.2ymdp3xjmewxz7ku@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2 On 05/10/2018 12:08 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> === gdb Summary === >> >> # of expected passes 3 >> >> Is my environment different from yours, i.e., is this something that >> is exposed on your internal tree? > > That's really odd. I'm on top of branch master, and without this patch, > I do get an error: > > | FAIL: gdb.ada/bp_fun_addr.exp: Run until breakpoint at a'address (the program exited) > | > | === gdb Summary === > | > | # of expected passes 2 > | # of unexpected failures 1 > > You wouldn't have rebuilt GDB with my patch without realizing it, > by any chance? Nope. All clean except for the test. > Other than that, the only difference I can think of is that I am > using GNAT Pro, rather than the GNU Ada compiler... I can send you > my executable, if it can help clarify the mystery. Yeah, send it my way, please. I'm just curious why this isn't working the way I thought it should. [I have no objections with your patch otherwise.] Keith