From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA273858D33 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 14:34:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DFA273858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org DFA273858D33 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1698244483; cv=none; b=vQe6kDwXdHc90XW+PRugRY5rPqyyfLCn1RAvrayxQLSlUsao9ipO+cGM9UuqIk55QwqDUWPRbICUFvC3KT8g7OQbfCSaAjRGaWifz40+t7D+zGmdCmdHjQ+waWCJA1Xo93BWO96Eecr72L7GNq2NtWgc/FpXEr0mtf8LD37dwvw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1698244483; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8UjQVy4sG4QyYO354bFqaeoWSU8AWWYAFYkqm+/UiZk=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=TSDWn/Xvw79Me0WHRH0Ouio3e1Fh0GOmQj5wS72P9y1hf+rVtpXkZKmgxx1fIrhBQzNZM/TcUkDh4FRbBlR7tRwrgI8d/Jj85aFHBW+P0DBU+hwrPp0fg2xTn9scNv6HiQiwubn5h4VhzVXfUDEYvYSd/e0FxBnE7Urm1aV+DV4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1698244481; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=t2vRezWInxoUVYBfKxjsmQSbPpes96T5Ep5XA6afMsM=; b=Jmo3znLCL+9bcg7A2AMSoT9Z9tAV/3bBiXHjxQ6Lr9GHvJDrtV/cr13LEg+VQONiwe0X2+ SfdPdep/ROJxClfCiWVT3U9ZqYGJvrX37MqXNIxEv9Bb0X8EQBGaqqfSxR3hkXmXYqxkEX MbhbOuRRDv9/nl9DJ2zBn9oqXipjhe0= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-554-AHkfsgFwOLOsT-D4fGnA5A-1; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:34:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: AHkfsgFwOLOsT-D4fGnA5A-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9c7f0a33afbso291737866b.3 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 07:34:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698244473; x=1698849273; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=t2vRezWInxoUVYBfKxjsmQSbPpes96T5Ep5XA6afMsM=; b=kRcRcMatQaJIEGDp7IQ6S2bi+SHonCcl0V5v/Inqgu250wWNgYcRiTBGkWtReWtJas AUvNyK5dy8OEJ/Ttnfe35fD/o/czf7jJfrIuXhxIKoj/4twOrefjIGXoMh5uaHk21ay6 uHt0dxGAcOECI/f2vgQuyEWfUji13hYTo+xdmZwoafcnc6W5LylfY+UwEpToHePBz3ni bxw+Y64x7UHdXkPK5BNKgaS04Tk5YMMQHk1LW0713ZfJ4beT4Icd/ODfLdkWrJmCSxfz ZoR+Bn337oNo+t8FzeZqAOYhkfBxA7/saNB+OqvMFmdQlLknFURFgXmOdE1mWVRGDt/Q IQLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyxqh4NbRxMf2vBB9zRwLoFvqKJv+K4g2fmWk4202vr2Nrao+XE tvmFoYB/29DpY+5aaXqahNaWmltWZgq/aVT/HmSp12a8/kXHNclbYvR6xVsOfzaxOFfX6kvgHRH M94waOp6RSEU32RILUNQyXCva25u7VrTIezPRY9FbGPFWYbJxqBTqYG3un8uFIE9E4Ex7L8ndwi mH2qml X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6093:b0:9c7:59d1:b2c6 with SMTP id ht19-20020a170907609300b009c759d1b2c6mr11699597ejc.11.1698244473251; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 07:34:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEiIJn286FclepBrYe3DScUHA/g62zjLU+gp8quPqmWrI4vVhGjSC+fZYQ1aK/R1uDU7jwFQg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6093:b0:9c7:59d1:b2c6 with SMTP id ht19-20020a170907609300b009c759d1b2c6mr11699582ejc.11.1698244472857; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 07:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.129] (ip-94-112-227-180.bb.vodafone.cz. [94.112.227.180]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ca9-20020a170906a3c900b009b8a4f9f20esm9988579ejb.102.2023.10.25.07.34.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 07:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <979c3bc7-af39-e68e-dea8-e40419661c7b@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:34:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: [PING][PATCH v5 0/1] update MAINTAINERS file with git trailers To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Guinevere Larsen References: <20231005113533.86112-2-blarsen@redhat.com> From: Guinevere Larsen In-Reply-To: <20231005113533.86112-2-blarsen@redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Ping! There has been some thoughts that this newest direction wasn't the best (see Kevin's emails). I would like some more discussion on which direction to take the text with regards to approved-by and acked-by before sending a new version. -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen She/Her/Hers On 05/10/2023 13:35, Guinevere Larsen wrote: > Some private chats highlighted that the currently in use git trailers > aren't explained well enough. This patch aims to fix that by adding the > information in a more verbose way to guarantee that everyone is on the > same page about them and refine anything that might still need work. > > I forgot that Kevin had given a soft approval of this, so I kept his > review tag, but further chatter on the latest cauldron conference had > people agreeing that Acked-by should be used as partial approval, so I > reworded that section of the patch to be more inline with how other > projects use it. > > One concern that was raised in the conference is how b4 reacts to > trailing parenthesis. It seems that newer b4 versions (at least on > 0.12.3) drop that, while older versions (0.10.1) keep it. I'm not sure > if this change was intentional or not, and I have informed the b4 > project of the regression, but this raises the question: Do we want to > have the trailing parenthesis saying which areas were approved by an > ack, or is it ok to just have it in regular text? > > Personally I like adding it either way in replies, but not making it a > requirement when pushing code, so its easy to see in old emails and no > one gets inconvenienced, but I'm not dead set on this. > > Guinevere Larsen (1): > [gdb]: add git trailer information on gdb/MAINTAINERS > > gdb/MAINTAINERS | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >