public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: make gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp require avx
@ 2024-11-25 17:57 Guinevere Larsen
  2024-12-03 16:00 ` Andrew Burgess
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guinevere Larsen @ 2024-11-25 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Guinevere Larsen

The test gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp was assuming that if the CPU
was like x86, it would have AVX instructions because I didn't know how
to check for AVX instruction support explicitly.  This commit updates
that to use the pre-existing TCL proc have_avx.

Also update the commet at the top of the test, since it was a copy of a
different test.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
index 6d8990067f2..cc920d3a2f3 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
@@ -16,15 +16,12 @@
 # This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
 
 #
-# This test tests some i386 general instructions for reverse execution.
+# This test tests i386 AVX instructions for reverse execution.  This
+# is supposed to test all supported instructions eventually.
 #
 
 require supports_reverse
-
-if {![istarget "*86*-*linux*"]} {
-    verbose "Skipping i386 reverse tests."
-    return
-}
+require have_avx
 
 # TODO: this is the case because I used xmm15 all over the test.
 # Some parts of the test require xmm15 to validate some code paths, but
-- 
2.47.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: make gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp require avx
  2024-11-25 17:57 [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: make gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp require avx Guinevere Larsen
@ 2024-12-03 16:00 ` Andrew Burgess
  2024-12-03 18:18   ` Guinevere Larsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Burgess @ 2024-12-03 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guinevere Larsen, gdb-patches; +Cc: Guinevere Larsen

Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com> writes:

> The test gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp was assuming that if the CPU
> was like x86, it would have AVX instructions because I didn't know how
> to check for AVX instruction support explicitly.  This commit updates
> that to use the pre-existing TCL proc have_avx.
>
> Also update the commet at the top of the test, since it was a copy of a

typo: 'comment'

With that fixed:

Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Andrew


> different test.
> ---
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
> index 6d8990067f2..cc920d3a2f3 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
> @@ -16,15 +16,12 @@
>  # This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
>  
>  #
> -# This test tests some i386 general instructions for reverse execution.
> +# This test tests i386 AVX instructions for reverse execution.  This
> +# is supposed to test all supported instructions eventually.
>  #
>  
>  require supports_reverse
> -
> -if {![istarget "*86*-*linux*"]} {
> -    verbose "Skipping i386 reverse tests."
> -    return
> -}
> +require have_avx
>  
>  # TODO: this is the case because I used xmm15 all over the test.
>  # Some parts of the test require xmm15 to validate some code paths, but
> -- 
> 2.47.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: make gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp require avx
  2024-12-03 16:00 ` Andrew Burgess
@ 2024-12-03 18:18   ` Guinevere Larsen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guinevere Larsen @ 2024-12-03 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Burgess, gdb-patches

On 12/3/24 1:00 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> The test gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp was assuming that if the CPU
>> was like x86, it would have AVX instructions because I didn't know how
>> to check for AVX instruction support explicitly.  This commit updates
>> that to use the pre-existing TCL proc have_avx.
>>
>> Also update the commet at the top of the test, since it was a copy of a
> typo: 'comment'
>
> With that fixed:
>
> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Fixed and pushed, thanks!

-- 
Cheers,
Guinevere Larsen
She/Her/Hers

>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
>> different test.
>> ---
>>   gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp | 9 +++------
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
>> index 6d8990067f2..cc920d3a2f3 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp
>> @@ -16,15 +16,12 @@
>>   # This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
>>   
>>   #
>> -# This test tests some i386 general instructions for reverse execution.
>> +# This test tests i386 AVX instructions for reverse execution.  This
>> +# is supposed to test all supported instructions eventually.
>>   #
>>   
>>   require supports_reverse
>> -
>> -if {![istarget "*86*-*linux*"]} {
>> -    verbose "Skipping i386 reverse tests."
>> -    return
>> -}
>> +require have_avx
>>   
>>   # TODO: this is the case because I used xmm15 all over the test.
>>   # Some parts of the test require xmm15 to validate some code paths, but
>> -- 
>> 2.47.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-03 18:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-25 17:57 [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: make gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp require avx Guinevere Larsen
2024-12-03 16:00 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-12-03 18:18   ` Guinevere Larsen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).