From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204913858D20; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:31:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 204913858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 204913858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710178293; cv=none; b=eK2G2mE4dl2WKN2VoNbEo8GLYy1Ppth/rebb4dxrxBSs2vcS6kE6s8O2C7OIuyJsMIal+fn0CycIQzbpaOmhbUvM7vcTh06zuDqpf0ank2sxSTATcoicQHZUlToHvUUIzPPu25Iy0wSekna7aRwQPEdpBAXvCqp7Q0bCGjXFOVI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710178293; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cKzSDUYsykr8A/+2hvZuoUqxoAlkmWiYs3Cil94LguY=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=Ilep8yS9v53CNovsB338uyWa0aR82VTYGC8Amrw9e3CMAJjLH/emdCtT8Vy73Fn9x5lUf4pVDI3C/UvxwdLd0MZvRHW01RKXdKSuDUabc+o8oJU2X516bgqhRGCSHtsqjTstLfosk7TIWiG7sK1Mf7YNY3YGC5y+9+orIBerJKs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1710178291; bh=cKzSDUYsykr8A/+2hvZuoUqxoAlkmWiYs3Cil94LguY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=LX8Bg3ql4AiDPTkcpQWDxyCu6l6WGUhChYIUFtLAa4P0DRWilKtR4ZqrUB8U9EuBu m/z7vEkVW4LXU9Bzh68c35AezAXRrz+fkAQdCPAf1LdnmVHgOSStY7drQ+DXPY6o9k MFFUCVlOCDK513miIr9HGQigMvAL3Qo3JfHCIZ6g= Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCBA51E0AC; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:31:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9b24d2c7-89d9-44cd-bad3-4b2634a977e8@simark.ca> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:31:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sync libbacktrace from gcc [PR31327] Content-Language: fr To: Sam James , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: binutils@sourceware.org References: <20240311172112.2435201-1-sam@gentoo.org> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <20240311172112.2435201-1-sam@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 3/11/24 13:21, Sam James wrote: > Note that this includes Nick's fix from edf64cd235f5ecb3725e7cf1ff83bbdb6dd53340 which > landed upstream a bit differently as r13-1566-g9ed57796235abc in GCC. > > This pulls in libbacktrace as of r14-9404-gc775a030af9cad in GCC trunk. Doing a diff between binutils-gdb/libbacktrace and gcc/libbacktrace, I see: $ diff -u libbacktrace ~/src/gcc/libbacktrace Only in /home/smarchi/src/gcc/libbacktrace: zstdtest.c Should that file be added in binutils-gdb/libbacktrace? Simon