From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99286 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2018 13:01:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 99269 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2018 13:01:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 13:01:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9FFF4084FF2; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E9F2026E04; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] improve btrace enable error reporting To: "Metzger, Markus T" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <1516976072-19282-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <2c57146a-7111-4381-3851-bd1ff4d610b9@redhat.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <9ce0c90a-5c71-0a7d-3779-f826369a95ec@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 13:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On 02/08/2018 10:40 AM, Metzger, Markus T wrote: >> Great, thanks. I'd think it a good idea to copy/paste that to the relevant patch's >> git log. > > [snip new logs] Thanks. > So you're suggesting to change > > "GDB does not support Intel Processor Trace." > > into > > "Intel Processor Trace support was disabled at compile time." > > Correct? Correct. > > We're already using the above in a warning in remote.c. I'd change that, as well, > to be consistent with the new wording. > > OK? OK. Thanks, Pedro Alves