From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76452 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 13:58:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 76444 invoked by uid 89); 13 Oct 2019 13:58:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:1496 X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:58:54 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DB0B149; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: GDB 9.1 release: Start of stabilization period ? To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Christian Biesinger , gdb-patches References: <20191012191938.GA2675@adacore.com> From: Tom de Vries Message-ID: <9d160e13-fd9e-e886-2709-2a7ea29cae93@suse.de> Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 On 13-10-2019 03:18, Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches wrote: > HI Joel, > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:19 PM Joel Brobecker wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Now that the 8.3.1 release is out, I think now is a good time to >> prepare the 9.1 release. I looked at the gdb/NEWS file and it is >> chockablock full of goodies! >> >> At the moment, there aren't any issues in bugzilla that are marked >> pending for GDB 9.1. >> >> Are there any issues that people would like to be fixed, before >> we release GDB 9.1? For those issues, it would be good to see whether >> these are blocking issues prior to branching, or not. >> >> In the meantime, while we start collecting the list of issues >> we want to fix for 9.1, if there aren't any objection, I'd like us >> to start a cooling period so as to stabilize GDB prior to branching. > > I'm not that familiar with the gdb release process, Likewise. Here's my wishlist: - [gdb/tdep] Fix 'Unexpected register class' assert in amd64_push_arguments https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00293.html - [gdb/tdep] Fix inferior call arg passing for amd64 https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00307.html - [gdb] Only force INTERP_CONSOLE ui_out for breakpoint commands in MI mode https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00099.html - [gdb/symtab] Prefer var def over decl https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00161.html Thanks, - Tom