From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10208 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2015 08:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10196 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2015 08:25:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mga02.intel.com Received: from mga02.intel.com (HELO mga02.intel.com) (134.134.136.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:25:24 +0000 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2015 00:25:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.25]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2015 00:25:20 -0800 Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.229]) by irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.15.8]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:23:01 +0000 From: "Metzger, Markus T" To: "palves@redhat.com" CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "Jan Kratochvil (jan.kratochvil@redhat.com)" Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 00/15] record btrace: prepare for a new trace format Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <1422548899-9789-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1422548899-9789-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: Metzger, Markus T > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 5:28 PM > To: palves@redhat.com Hello Pedro, > btrace: add struct btrace_data > btrace: add format argument to supports_btrace > btrace, linux: add perf event buffer abstraction > record btrace: add configuration struct > record-btrace: add bts buffer size configuration option > btrace: update btrace_compute_ftrace parameters > btrace: extend struct btrace_insn > btrace: identify cpu > record-btrace: indicate gaps I don't think it was a very good idea from me to extend the patch series while under review. Let's focus on the above patches from the original series... > btrace: less debug output > btrace: work around _dl_runtime_resolve returning to resolved function > btrace: support 32-bit inferior on 64-bit host > btrace: increase buffer size for exception test ... and ignore the new bug-fix patches. I'll send them in a new, separate review request. I found another bug I see on some targets and I'm working on simplifying the test suite. If I keep adding (those) patches to this se= ries, we will never get anywhere with it. Makes sense? Markus. Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052