From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15445 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2010 17:26:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 15437 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2010 17:26:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:26:27 +0000 Received: from wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.85]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oAFHQO4m013522 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:26:24 -0800 Received: from qwb8 (qwb8.prod.google.com [10.241.193.72]) by wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oAFHQ8ZM001437 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:26:23 -0800 Received: by qwb8 with SMTP id 8so116105qwb.39 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:26:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.181.134 with SMTP id by6mr191986qab.36.1289841982628; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:26:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.188.66 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:26:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101115172018.6E05C2461AA@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <20101115172018.6E05C2461AA@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [commit] increase timeout for "maint print statistics" test From: Doug Evans To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Doug Evans wrote: > Hi. > > fyi, I checked this in. > I happened to see a timeout on a linux machine I was testing on > so I just increased the timeout for all targets. > Plus the test wasn't restoring the timeout afterwards. > > 2010-11-15 =A0Doug Evans =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.base/maint.exp (maint print statistics): Increase ti= meout for > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0all targets. =A0Restore old timeout afterwards. Heh, except that was in a 7.2 tree, and porting the patch over I see Ulrich already fixed it (in a better way). Reverted.