From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix new FAIL `reject p 0x1.1' [fixup]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=HmuYkhHa-3BJ1pb0NUfJB5oiE4ea23YD87DHN@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100831193749.GA18505@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:57:19 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> > >> While thanks for catching it I still believe now my testcase update is the
> > >> appropriate fix - if glibc supports then extended input syntax let the GDB
> > >> user benefit from it.
> > >
> > > It's ok with me.
> >
> > I should add that IWBN to have an additional testcase that exercises
> > sscanf (...) == 0 on newer glibcs.
>
> OK, I forgot first. OK to check-in? Tested both cases (RHEL-4.8 and
> Fedora14snapshot).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan
>
>
> gdb/testsuite/
> 2010-08-31 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> * gdb.base/printcmds.exp (test_float_accepted): Import gdb_prompt.
> Move here, negate and extend by XFAIL the "p 0x1.1" test from ...
> (test_float_rejected): ... here.
> * gdb.java/jv-print.exp (test_float_accepted): Import gdb_prompt.
> Move here, negate and extend by XFAIL the "p 0x1.1" test from ...
> (test_float_rejected): ... here.
Apologies for the resend. Somehow it went out as text/html (which the
list rejects).
This is ok with me, but I think you also want to similarly patch
gdb.{objc,pascal}/print.exp, right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-31 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 0:31 [patch] Handle 0 result from sscanf when parsing fp values Doug Evans
2010-08-17 8:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-08-17 11:37 ` Doug Evans
2010-08-18 20:38 ` Doug Evans
2010-08-20 7:34 ` [patch] Fix new FAIL `reject p 0x1.1' [Re: [patch] Handle 0 result from sscanf when parsing fp values.] Jan Kratochvil
2010-08-20 7:37 ` [patch] Fix new FAIL `reject p 0x1.1' [fixup] " Jan Kratochvil
2010-08-20 11:58 ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-08-23 15:35 ` Doug Evans
2010-08-23 18:55 ` [patch] Fix new FAIL `reject p 0x1.1' [fixup] Jan Kratochvil
2010-08-23 19:49 ` Doug Evans
2010-08-23 19:57 ` Doug Evans
2010-08-31 19:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-08-31 22:51 ` Doug Evans [this message]
2010-09-02 15:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-06 22:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=HmuYkhHa-3BJ1pb0NUfJB5oiE4ea23YD87DHN@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).