From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31097 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2010 22:51:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 31088 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2010 22:51:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:51:29 +0000 Received: from hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.1]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o7VMpRln021664 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:51:27 -0700 Received: from vws16 (vws16.prod.google.com [10.241.21.144]) by hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o7VMpPw7003702 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:51:26 -0700 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so7544249vws.0 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:51:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.163.10 with SMTP id y10mr4726442vcx.203.1283295085264; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.73 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:51:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100831193749.GA18505@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100820073430.GA28054@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100820073703.GA19257@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100823185451.GA3512@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100831193749.GA18505@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] Fix new FAIL `reject p 0x1.1' [fixup] From: Doug Evans To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:57:19 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > > >> While thanks for catching it I still believe now my testcase update = is the > > >> appropriate fix - if glibc supports then extended input syntax let t= he GDB > > >> user benefit from it. > > > > > > It's ok with me. > > > > I should add that IWBN to have an additional testcase that exercises > > sscanf (...) =3D=3D 0 on newer glibcs. > > OK, I forgot first. =A0OK to check-in? =A0Tested both cases (RHEL-4.8 and > Fedora14snapshot). > > > Thanks, > Jan > > > gdb/testsuite/ > 2010-08-31 =A0Jan Kratochvil =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.base/printcmds.exp (test_float_accepted): Import gdb= _prompt. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Move here, negate and extend by XFAIL the "p 0x1.1" test f= rom ... > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(test_float_rejected): ... here. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.java/jv-print.exp (test_float_accepted): Import gdb_= prompt. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Move here, negate and extend by XFAIL the "p 0x1.1" test f= rom ... > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(test_float_rejected): ... here. Apologies for the resend. Somehow it went out as text/html (which the list rejects). This is ok with me, but I think you also want to similarly patch gdb.{objc,pascal}/print.exp, right?