From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-76278-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21175 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2010 18:20:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 21166 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2010 18:20:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:19:56 +0000
Received: from wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.85])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oA2IJs9p032357	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:19:54 -0700
Received: from pvc21 (pvc21.prod.google.com [10.241.209.149])	by wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oA2IJIH6021662	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:19:53 -0700
Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so1198013pvc.14        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.157.12 with SMTP id f12mr2498194wfe.71.1288721993513; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.192.73 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20101102181003.GA25177@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
References: <201010221920.30046.ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<20101026195747.GE2847@adacore.com>	<20101027190417.GA19067@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<201010272020.51386.pedro@codesourcery.com>	<20101102165134.GA19296@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<AANLkTimWg8HcVGa756vxHr=azHZTxU7KwrH+m_E+XBrV@mail.gmail.com>	<20101102180110.GB2492@adacore.com>	<20101102181003.GA25177@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:20:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=LsMKEzyT7k=9p1p29LwggtW=BhrUctqPUmcgD@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [doc RFA] Switch to GCC coding style
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        Ken Werner <ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,        Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> The current code is not strictly compliant to any standard anyway.

I dunno.  Sure the code deviates here and there, and some things
aren't specified, but there is a standard and where there is one
strictness is pretty much followed.