From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-75380-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13723 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2010 23:11:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 13714 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2010 23:11:06 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:11:02 +0000
Received: from hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.7])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o81NAxZQ021104	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:10:59 -0700
Received: from qyk9 (qyk9.prod.google.com [10.241.83.137])	by hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o81NAwJi018591	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:10:58 -0700
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so8415769qyk.3        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.19.132 with SMTP id a4mr5770994qab.62.1283382657367; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.200.73 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimB6uPbPQOLY-0SFeG_Zfo0Ea1V1Xr0mj-j3cTB@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C6946E1.6000709@redhat.com>	<AANLkTikH1rBzysO-nNT-w3a0me7zMcGfSpn7+7oJQdWk@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTikbMcvP-+2iqZB3gP-gLcWY7B7r4t+HWtHK-a6f@mail.gmail.com>	<4C6D5C83.3050602@redhat.com>	<m3eidu2vt7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<4C756132.5050301@redhat.com>	<20100901082539.GA24609@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<20100901161952.GX2986@adacore.com>	<20100901164716.GY2986@adacore.com>	<4C7E96FA.2080209@redhat.com>	<AANLkTiktKEH04642oBgKC1LJO2jwp4zF4941Z6L3dM3H@mail.gmail.com>	<m3y6blb98k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<4C7EA30B.7020007@redhat.com>	<AANLkTimsOWkmm-n08E5d-kZNDvjhmhzNZ65w1cxTiffq@mail.gmail.com>	<4C7EA94E.4010104@redhat.com>	<AANLkTimB6uPbPQOLY-0SFeG_Zfo0Ea1V1Xr0mj-j3cTB@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:19:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=x3zLs1n2XkCff7_utnBx7RHmzEPASZMydmoJ0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regression for gdb.stabs/gdb11479.exp [Re: [patch 1/2] Use custom hash function with bcache]
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: sami wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> I think that stems from the old
> bcache-the-entire-thing-as-a-byte-array behaviour, but that's gone now
> (thankfully).

Err, s/bcache-the/hash-the/