From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-74847-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28421 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2010 18:57:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 28410 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2010 18:57:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:57:48 +0000
Received: from hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.5])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o7AIvkLe021944	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:57:46 -0700
Received: from vws3 (vws3.prod.google.com [10.241.21.131])	by hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o7AIvTQ2022712	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:57:45 -0700
Received: by vws3 with SMTP id 3so10088698vws.33        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.123.33 with SMTP id n33mr10776492vcr.64.1281466664523; 	Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.189.196 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3hbj2cnlv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <m3aaqcqhgn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m339vs36lj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m3r5ik4s15.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTin0GfPdMACxbg_PfNs_haMwjKr1P391mm6Kuaj5@mail.gmail.com>	<m3r5idvx8d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTimhHWde0=EVrNeyCLb4iyDgT_5KWvfQUALZB-fi@mail.gmail.com>	<m3k4o4vnnh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTikOcq=YXgWaaRLeOm4o1EjbRs6_5TnP=MKw1ft2@mail.gmail.com>	<m339urtzbs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTi=+bdMUtn6JcwHRMJrvT42=-ToAeM-S81KOGrcG@mail.gmail.com>	<m34of3h6bn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTikm40Nu2b8p2Tc2A+bucPpW_tg07820LdJBAJb5@mail.gmail.com>	<m3hbj2cnlv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTiku_sfPq75Cb27ZD2tjZr-HxDvG+hCcRwWRE56a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [0/4] RFC: add DWARF index support
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
>
> Doug> Are you sure you'll just ignore *all* such errors?
>
> Yes.
>
> Doug> I suspect you'd want to at least catch, for example, spelling errors
> Doug> in file names passed to the script.
>
> There won't be spelling errors, since in our use gdb-add-index is run
> from an RPM build script.

And RPM build scripts never have bugs, including while they're being developed?

But ok, it's not that important.