From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7610 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2011 15:21:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 7601 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2011 15:21:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:21:04 +0000 Received: from hpaq11.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq11.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.11]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p0QFL1EX003443 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:21:01 -0800 Received: from qyk34 (qyk34.prod.google.com [10.241.83.162]) by hpaq11.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p0QFJDTs028590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:21:00 -0800 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so5314328qyk.17 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:21:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.80.212 with SMTP id u20mr548321qak.128.1296055259879; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:20:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.29.204 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:20:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20110119204315.0A235190C48@elbrus2.mtv.corp.google.com> <201101191409.17445.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Paul Pluzhnikov Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] Fix leak of bp_jit_event breakpoints To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao Qi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > That appears to work reasonably well. > > It fixes both the gdbserver failure in jit.exp, and also as yet undiscovered > problem: the old static/global jit_descriptor_addr couldn't possibly work > for more than one inferior. Ping? -- Paul Pluzhnikov